Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 18, 2025

Isolation and Flow Cytometric Analysis of Glioma-infiltrating Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells
Published on: November 28, 2015
Molecular and clinical determinants of response to checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy in glioblastoma
Pushan Dasgupta1,2, Heather Lin3, Gayatri Kumar4
1Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. Pushan.dasgupta@bcm.edu.
Purpose:
While checkpoint inhibitor therapy (CPI) has transformed treatment in multiple solid tumors, its efficacy in glioblastoma (GBM) remains limited. Understanding the molecular and clinical factors that influence glioblastoma's response to CPI is essential to improving outcomes.
Methods:
We identified patients with recurrent GBM, who had been treated with CPI and determined the association between their molecular, clinical, and demographic characteristics and survival outcomes.
Results:
We identified 35 patients with recurrent GBM treated with CPI. PIK3CA mutation was associated with a statistically significant shorter OS duration, calculated from CPI initiation (p-value = 0.014). Tumor tissue without the mutation had less PD-1 expression in CD3+/CD8 + T cells. RB1 and TERT promoter mutations were associated with shorter PFS durations (p-value = 0.009, 0.053, respectively). Length of CPI therapy of more than 6 months was associated with increased PFS and OS (p-value = 0.069, 0.088, respectively), while steroid use at baseline was associated with a shorter OS (p-value = 0.0016). Multifocal disease was associated with shorter PFS and OS durations (p-value = 0.0011, 0.0015, respectively) among all patients.
Conclusions:
In glioblastoma, PIK3CA, RB1, TERT promoter mutations, steroid use prior to start of CPI, and multifocal disease may be associated with a poor response to CPI while increased length of CPI may be associated with improved response. Our results may provide the rationale for clinical trials combining PI3K inhibitors with CPI in glioblastoma. The small sample size and retrospective nature of the study carries selection bias and/or confounding effects and larger studies need to be done to validate these results.
Insights
Checkpoint inhibitor therapy (CPI) shows limited efficacy in glioblastoma (GBM). PIK3CA, RB1, and TERT promoter mutations, steroid use, and multifocal disease are linked to poor response, while longer CPI treatment may improve outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Neuro-oncology
- Immunotherapy
- Genomics
Background:
- Checkpoint inhibitor therapy (CPI) has revolutionized cancer treatment but shows limited efficacy in glioblastoma (GBM).
- Identifying factors influencing GBM response to CPI is crucial for improving patient outcomes.
- Understanding the molecular and clinical landscape of GBM is key to optimizing immunotherapy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between molecular, clinical, and demographic characteristics and survival outcomes in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with CPI.
- To identify predictive biomarkers for CPI response in GBM.
- To inform the development of novel therapeutic strategies for glioblastoma.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 35 patients with recurrent GBM treated with CPI.
- Correlation of patient survival outcomes (Overall Survival - OS, Progression-Free Survival - PFS) with molecular mutations (PIK3CA, RB1, TERT promoter), treatment duration, steroid use, and disease characteristics (multifocal disease).
Main Results:
- PIK3CA mutation was significantly associated with shorter OS (p=0.014).
- RB1 and TERT promoter mutations correlated with shorter PFS (p=0.009, p=0.053).
- Longer CPI treatment (>6 months) showed a trend towards improved PFS and OS (p=0.069, p=0.088), while steroid use and multifocal disease were linked to poorer outcomes.
Conclusions:
- PIK3CA, RB1, TERT promoter mutations, steroid use, and multifocal disease may predict poor response to CPI in glioblastoma.
- Extended CPI therapy duration might be associated with improved survival.
- These findings suggest potential for combining PI3K inhibitors with CPI and warrant further investigation in larger studies.

