Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 18, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
Published on: August 9, 2024
A rubric for assessing conformance to the Ten Rules for credible practice of modeling and simulation in healthcare
Alexandra Manchel1,2, Ahmet Erdemir2,3, Lealem Mulugeta2,4
1Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Abstract:
The power of computational modeling and simulation (M&S) is realized when the results are credible, and the workflow generates evidence that supports credibility for the context of use. The Committee on Credible Practice of Modeling & Simulation in Healthcare was established to help address the need for processes and procedures to support the credible use of M&S in healthcare and biomedical research. Our community efforts have led to the Ten Rules (TR) for Credible Practice of M&S in life sciences and healthcare. This framework is an outcome of a multidisciplinary investigation from a wide range of stakeholders beginning in 2012. Here, we present a pragmatic rubric for assessing the conformance of an M&S activity to the TR. This rubric considers the ability of an M&S study to communicate how well the study conforms to the Ten Rules for credible practice and facilitate outreach to a wide range of stakeholders from context-specific M&S practitioners to policymakers. It uses an ordinal scale ranging from Insufficient (zero) to Comprehensive (four) that is applicable to each rule, providing a uniform approach for comparing assessments across different reviewers and different modeling studies. We used the rubric to evaluate the conformance of two computational modeling activities: 1. six viral disease (COVID-19) propagation models, and 2. a model of hepatic glycogenolysis with neural innervation and calcium signaling. These examples were used to evaluate the applicability of the rubric and illustrate rubric usage in real-world M&S scenarios including those that bridge scientific M&S with policymaking. The COVID-19 M&S studies were of particular interest because they needed to be quickly operationalized by government and private decision-makers early in the COVID-19 pandemic and were accessible as open-source tools. Our findings demonstrate that the TR rubric represents a systematic tool for assessing the conformance of an M&S activity to codified good practices and enhances the value of the TR for supporting real-world decision-making.
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Standards II
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy...
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse II
For example, a nurse demonstrating respect and compassion might listen attentively to a patient's concerns, provide...
Nursing Code of Ethics
Ethical Standards I
The Code of Ethics provisions outline the nurse's duty to the patient, the healthcare team, the profession, and society. The Code's fundamental principles include advocacy,...

