IPSS-M risk and specific sex-associated somatic mutations predict response to ESA therapy in LR-MDS: building a new
Marco Gabriele Gabriele Raddi1,2, Sophie Park3, Michaela Fontenay4
1Myelodysplastic Syndromes Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Hematology, University of Florence, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Abstract:
Acquired somatic mutations are incorporated in the classification and prognosis of myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDSs). However, the predictive role of molecular features in MDS needs to be elucidated, especially in the lower-risk subtypes (LR-MDS), where treatment has become heterogeneous and predictive biomarkers are lacking. In this study, we investigated genetic markers associated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) response in LR-MDS. A European cohort of 535 patients with LR-MDS was analyzed using targeted next-generation sequencing (t-NGS) to calculate molecular prognostic scores (International Prognostic Scoring System, molecular [IPSS-M]). The integration of IPSS-M score among the 2 known variables, serum erythropoietin (sEPO) and transfusion dependence (TD), refined the capability to predict response (area under the curve [AUC], 0.71 vs 0.63, P = .0004). Based on these 3 variables, a molecular predictive score, which we named ESA-PSS-M (-0.05 × [sEPO U/L] -4.5 × [IPSS-M score] -5 × [TD (yes = 1; no = 0)]; specificity 76%; sensitivity 57%), was generated and validated in an external cohort (n = 223 patients with LR-MDS). Despite the impact of IPSS-M score, no single mutated gene was linked to ESA response; however, when we stratified cases by sex at birth, the X-linked STAG2 gene mutations were significantly associated with ESA resistance in males with LR-MDS (odds ratio, 0.13; P = .003). To our knowledge, this is the first study based on a large multicenter cohort of patients suggesting that the integration of IPSS-M score and sex-specific mutations can characterize ESA resistance and guide first-line (1L) therapeutic choices for anemic LR-MDS (ie, ESAs vs luspatercept).
More Related Videos
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
10:21Author Spotlight: Exploring the Role of Inflammation in the Co-occurrence of Primary Sjogren's Syndrome and Lung Adenocarcinoma
Published on: September 20, 2024
