Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 18, 2025

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Patients' experiences of a patient-centred polypharmacy medication review intervention: a mixed-methods study
Lorna J Duncan1, Deborah McCahon2, Barbara Caddick1
1Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Background:
People prescribed multiple medications need regular review to optimise medication and improve health outcomes. Although the most effective method to improve inappropriate polypharmacy remains unclear, medication reviews incorporating patient-centred care and shared decision making are believed to be key to achieving optimal outcomes.
Aim:
To explore patients' experiences of an intervention to deliver patient-centred polypharmacy medication review in primary care.
Design And Setting:
A mixed-methods process evaluation was undertaken within the Improving Medicines use in People with Polypharmacy in Primary Care (IMPPP) randomised controlled trial conducted in the Bristol and West Midlands regions of England.
Method:
Participants receiving the intervention were invited to complete a patient experience survey. Additionally, participants were purposively sampled and invited to participate in an interview and/or audio-recording of their medication review, to explore views and experiences.
Results:
Survey response rate was 72.5% (n = 556/767); 28 patients were interviewed, 27 reviews were recorded. Overall, 73.2% (n = 407) were satisfied with their review, strongly associated with shared decision making, and 79.9% (n = 444) expressed satisfaction with how the review was delivered (primarily pharmacist-led telephone consultations). Most audio-recordings of reviews demonstrated collaborative decision making. Patients valued reviews when they felt well-informed, prepared, and received clear follow-up. Pharmacist-led delivery was acceptable, although unfamiliarity with the reviewer and concerns about prescribing authority were perceived negatively.
Conclusion:
Participants were satisfied with their review, although this may be contingent on preparation and support. Findings highlight the importance of communication throughout, and how the clinician role and familiarity shape patient experience. A person-centred review approach has the potential to improve patient experience, satisfaction, and engagement.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Therapy
Antianxiety Medications
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Patient-centered Care
Blind Procedures
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...

