Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

07:20
Detecting the Lyme Disease Spirochete, Borrelia Burgdorferi, in Ticks Using Nested PCR
Published on: February 4, 2018
18.2K
Lyme Disease Testing Practices, Wisconsin, USA, 2016-2019
Emerging Infectious Diseases
|June 25, 2025
Summary
Repeat laboratory testing for Lyme disease, especially in older adults, can skew U.S. surveillance data. This practice of retesting previously positive individuals may impact accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Epidemiology
- Infectious Disease Surveillance
Background:
- Laboratory diagnostic tests are crucial for monitoring Lyme disease prevalence in the United States.
- Interpreting surveillance data relies heavily on accurate and consistent testing methodologies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of repeat laboratory testing on Lyme disease surveillance data.
- To determine the frequency of repeat positive Lyme disease tests and associated demographic factors.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of a national dataset of Lyme disease laboratory results.
- Assessment of repeat testing rates among individuals with previous positive serology.
- Stratification of repeat testing frequency by patient age.
Main Results:
- Between 6% and 15% of individuals with a positive Lyme disease test in a given year had also tested positive in a previous year.
- The likelihood of repeat testing increased significantly with advancing patient age.
- This indicates a notable proportion of positive results may stem from individuals with historical seropositivity.
Conclusions:
- Repeat testing in individuals with prior positive Lyme disease results can introduce bias into national surveillance data.
- Age is a significant factor influencing the frequency of such repeat testing.
- Public health agencies should consider these findings to refine Lyme disease surveillance strategies and data interpretation.
Keywords:
Borrelia burgdorferiLyme diseaseUnited StatesWisconsinbacterialaboratory testingsurveillancevector-borne infectionszoonoses
