Clinician Recommendation for Hereditary Genetic Testing in Participants at Increased Risk for Hereditary Cancer
Emerson Delacroix1,2, Sarah Austin2, John D Rice3
1Department of Health Behavior & Health Equity, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Genetic testing (GT) for hereditary cancers is underutilized, with clinician recommendations being key. Financial stress and higher education were linked to lower recommendation rates in a study of at-risk individuals.
Area of Science:
- Medical Genetics
- Oncology
- Public Health
Background:
- Genetic testing (GT) is crucial for managing hereditary cancers but remains underutilized in clinical practice.
- Key barriers to GT uptake include knowledge gaps, cost, and inconsistent clinician recommendations.
- Clinician recommendation is a significant driver for patient uptake of genetic testing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze factors associated with receiving a clinician recommendation for genetic testing (GT) among individuals with increased hereditary cancer risk.
- To identify demographic and clinical characteristics influencing the likelihood of a GT recommendation.
Main Methods:
- A survey was administered to 784 adult participants with personal or family history suggestive of hereditary cancer risk who had not undergone GT.
- Multivariable logistic regression analyzed associations between participant demographics, cancer history, and receipt of a clinician recommendation for GT.
Main Results:
- Only 14.0% of eligible participants reported receiving a clinician recommendation for GT.
- Lower recommendation rates were observed in younger adults, those without financial stress, and individuals with higher education levels.
- Multivariate analysis indicated that participants reporting no financial stress were less likely to receive a GT recommendation (p=0.049).
Conclusions:
- Significant disparities exist in clinician-led recommendations for genetic testing (GT).
- Enhanced clinician education on GT indications and implementation of decision support tools are needed.
- Systematic identification of patients with personal/family history meeting GT criteria is essential for equitable access.
More Related Videos
13:04In Vivo and Ex Vivo Approaches to Study Ovarian Cancer Metastatic Colonization of Milky Spot Structures in Peritoneal Adipose
Published on: October 14, 2015
05:53Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Cancer-Critical Genes I: Proto-oncogenes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
