Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 18, 2025

09:33
Neuronavigated Focalized Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Administered During Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: November 15, 2024
1.5K
Anatomical Characteristics Predict Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): Development of a
Giulia Caiani1,2, Emma Chiaramello2, Marta Parazzini2
1Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria (DEIB), Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)
|June 26, 2025
Summary
Personalized transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is crucial for effective treatment. Anatomical variations significantly impact tDCS electric field distribution and patient response, necessitating individualized approaches.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Biomedical Engineering
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) shows promise for neurological and psychological disorders.
- Inter-subject variability in tDCS after-effects limits treatment efficacy.
- Current fixed-dose methods neglect individual anatomical differences.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how age and anatomical features (CSF volume, skull thickness, brain tissue composition) influence tDCS electric field distribution and cortical excitability.
- To develop a personalized approach for tDCS by accounting for individual patient morphology.
Main Methods:
- Computational modeling of electric field distribution using realistic head models from MRI scans of 23 adults and children.
- Analysis of correlations between anatomical variables and electric field strength.
- Identification of factors influencing tDCS responsiveness.
Main Results:
- Significant negative correlations were found between maximum electric field strength and anatomical parameters (p < 0.05).
- The percentage of brain tissue exposed to electric fields above 0.227 V/m was a key determinant of tDCS responsiveness.
- Multiple regression models were proposed for predicting patient response.
Conclusions:
- Individual anatomical variations significantly affect tDCS outcomes.
- Personalized tDCS, guided by computational models and patient-specific anatomy, can enhance treatment efficacy.
- Tailoring current intensity to individual morphology is essential for optimizing tDCS therapy.
Keywords:
anodal tDCSclinical outcomecomputational modellingcortical excitabilityneuromodulationpersonalized medicine
