Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 18, 2025

Synthetic, Multi-Layer, Self-Oscillating Vocal Fold Model Fabrication
Published on: December 2, 2011
Dynamically Quantifying Vocal Fold Thickness: Effects of Medialization Implant Location on Glottal Shape and
Charles Farbos de Luzan1, Jacob Michaud-Dorko2, Rebecca J Howell1
1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA.
None:
Unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) can lead to significant dysphonia. Medialization thyroplasty type 1 (TT1) is a common surgical intervention aiming at improving vocal quality by optimally positioning the paralyzed fold to generate the necessary vibrations for phonation. Implants are generally placed through the thyroid cartilage in a sedated patient and positioned either underneath the level of the vocal folds (infraglottal medialization or IM) or at the level of the vocal folds (glottal medialization or GM). Using high-speed three-dimensional digital image correlation (3D-DIC) in an ex vivo canine hemilarynx model, this study explores the impact of implant location, specifically IM versus GM on the pre-phonatory and dynamic vertical thickness, glottal divergence, flow rate (Q), and cepstral peak prominence (CPP) under varying adduction and subglottal pressure conditions. IM consistently increased glottal divergence and dynamic vertical thickness, particularly in under-adducted states (AL1), despite producing lower static thickness than GM. CPP remained unaffected by the implant condition, but Q decreased significantly with IM under AL1, indicating enhanced glottal resistance and closure. These findings suggest that IM may offer superior functional outcomes by restoring divergent glottal shaping and improving vibratory efficiency. This study also introduces a validated method for dynamically quantifying vocal fold thickness and emphasizes the importance of implant depth in medialization thyroplasty strategies.

