The Impact of Work Connectivity Behavior on Employee Time Theft: The Role of Revenge Motive and Leader-Member Exchange
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Employee time theft is a costly issue. This study found that work connectivity behavior can increase time theft by triggering revenge, but strong leader-member exchange can mitigate this effect.
Area Of Science
- Organizational Behavior
- Business Ethics
- Psychology
Background
- Employee time theft is a prevalent and expensive problem across industries.
- Existing research on the drivers of employee time theft is limited.
- Understanding the mechanisms behind unethical behavior is crucial for organizations.
Purpose Of The Study
- To empirically investigate how work connectivity behavior influences employee time theft.
- To examine the mediating role of revenge motives in this relationship.
- To explore the moderating effect of leader-member exchange.
Main Methods
- Utilized social exchange theory as the theoretical framework.
- Collected data from a sample of 330 employees.
- Employed statistical analysis to test a moderated mediation model.
Main Results
- Work connectivity behavior was found to positively predict employee time theft.
- Revenge motives significantly mediated the relationship between work connectivity behavior and time theft.
- Leader-member exchange weakened both the direct and indirect effects.
Conclusions
- Work connectivity behavior can foster employee time theft through revenge motives.
- Effective leader-member exchange is a critical factor in mitigating this unethical behavior.
- The findings offer practical strategies for organizations to reduce time theft.
Related Concept Videos
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
People are motivated to maximize the...
Affiliation motivation is the intrinsic desire to connect with others and belong to a social group, which plays a crucial role in forming and maintaining personal relationships. This type of motivation is essential for psychological well-being, as it provides individuals with a sense of community and support. An example of this is a student who joins a study group in order to feel a sense of connection. People with high affiliation motivation actively seek social approval, take satisfaction in...
The human body employs intricate mechanisms to counteract changes in blood pH, preventing conditions like acidosis (pH < 7.35) and alkalosis (pH > 7.45). These compensatory responses aim to restore normal arterial blood pH by engaging respiratory or renal systems, depending on the source of the imbalance.
Respiratory Compensation
This mechanism addresses metabolic-induced pH imbalances by adjusting breathing rates. Respiratory compensation begins within minutes of detecting a pH...

