Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 18, 2025

09:49
Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
Published on: December 24, 2015
14.3K
Juror Characteristics and Decision Making in a Developed Coercive Control Case
Kacey May Barnett1, Russell Woodfield1, Rachel A Conlon1
1School of Psychology, Leeds Trinity University, Leeds LS18 5HD, UK.
Behavioral Sciences (Basel, Switzerland)
|June 26, 2025
Summary
Juror attitudes towards coercive control, not psychopathic traits, significantly predicted Not Guilty verdicts. Understanding these attitudes is crucial for fairer trials and improved criminal justice responses to coercive control.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Criminology
- Law
Background:
- Coercive control is a pattern of behavior that can be difficult for legal systems to identify and prosecute.
- Juror decision-making in coercive control trials may be influenced by personal characteristics and attitudes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how juror age, attitudes towards coercive control, and psychopathic personality traits (PPT) influence verdicts in coercive control trials.
- To identify significant predictors of Guilty or Not Guilty verdicts in mock coercive control trials.
Main Methods:
- 135 participants completed an online survey with a mock coercive control trial scenario.
- Questionnaires included the Modern Adolescent Dating Violence Attitudes (MADVA (CC)) Scale, Psychopathic Personality Traits Scale-Revised (PPTS-R), and Juror Decision Scale (JDS).
- Binary logistic regression analysis was used to determine predictors of verdicts.
Main Results:
- Significant positive correlations were found between coercive control attitudes (MADVA (CC)) and psychopathic traits (PPTS-R).
- Higher MADVA (CC) scores were the sole significant predictor of Not Guilty verdicts.
- Jurors returning Not Guilty verdicts showed more accepting attitudes towards controlling behaviors, higher defendant believability ratings, and less decision confidence.
Conclusions:
- Juror attitudes towards coercive control are significant factors in verdict decisions, potentially more so than psychopathic traits.
- Improved identification of coercive control tactics and enhanced training for criminal justice professionals are recommended.
- Further research is needed on the development of accepting attitudes towards coercive control and on educating the public to ensure fairer trials.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: Traditional Method
4.2K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.2K
Decision Making
247
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
247
The Stanford Prison Experiment
23.7K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
23.7K
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
6.6K
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
6.6K
Conduct Disorder
114
Conduct disorder is a complex mental health diagnosis characterized by a repetitive and persistent pattern of behavior that violates societal norms, the rights of others, or age-appropriate rules. The diagnostic criteria for conduct disorder require the presence of at least three problematic behaviors within the past 12 months, with at least one occurring in the past six months. These behaviors are grouped into four categories: aggression toward people and animals; destruction of property;...
114
Confirmation Biases
7.2K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.2K

