Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 18, 2025

07:11
Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
Published on: May 23, 2020
7.5K
Evaluation of Mandibular Fixation Techniques Using Monocortical Plates After Mandibular Setback Surgery
Seung-Woo Lee1,2, Bong-Jin Jeong1,2, Junho Jung1
1Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Kyung Hee University College of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea.
Life (Basel, Switzerland)
|June 26, 2025
Summary
Mandibular fixation with a three-screw technique after sagittal split ramus osteotomy led to greater counterclockwise rotation and less pogonion displacement. This suggests inadequate fixation may cause unwanted rotational changes in skeletal Class III patients.
Area of Science:
- Orthognathic Surgery
- Maxillofacial Reconstruction
- Skeletal Class III Correction
Background:
- Skeletal Class III malocclusion often requires orthognathic surgery, specifically sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO), to correct jaw discrepancies.
- Mandibular fixation techniques are crucial for stabilizing bone segments post-SSRO, influencing surgical outcomes and long-term stability.
- Understanding the biomechanical effects of different fixation methods is essential for optimizing patient results and minimizing complications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of three different monocortical plate fixation techniques on mandibular segment stability following SSRO in skeletal Class III patients.
- To evaluate the rotational stability of the proximal segment and the positional changes of the pogonion (chin) based on fixation methods.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study involving 93 skeletal Class III patients undergoing SSRO.
- Patients were divided into three groups based on fixation: Group 1 (4-hole miniplate, 1 proximal/2 distal screws), Group 2 (4-hole miniplate, 4 screws), Group 3 (sliding plate, 2 proximal/1 distal screws).
- Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were analyzed at immediate postoperative, 6 months, and 12 months to assess segment rotation (yaw, roll, pitch) and pogonion displacement (horizontal, vertical).
Main Results:
- Group 1 demonstrated significantly greater counterclockwise rotation of the proximal segment at 6 and 12 months postoperatively compared to Groups 2 and 3 (p < 0.05).
- Group 1 also showed significantly less anterior and superior displacement of the pogonion at 12 months (p < 0.01).
- The findings suggest that the three-screw fixation in Group 1 may provide a fulcrum effect, limiting undesirable clockwise rotation of the distal segment.
Conclusions:
- The fixation technique using a four-hole miniplate with one proximal and two distal screws (three-screw fixation) appears to offer superior rotational stability for the proximal segment after SSRO in skeletal Class III patients.
- This fixation method resulted in more favorable pogonion positioning, indicating better control over mandibular repositioning.
- The study highlights the importance of screw placement and number in achieving stable mandibular fixation and predictable outcomes in orthognathic surgery.

