Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 18, 2025

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
Published on: February 6, 2015
Stepped-care models for cancer symptom management: a systematic review of efficacy and cost-effectiveness
Tasnim Abdalla1, Gursharan K Singh2,3, Shiva Pouraliroudbaneh4,5
1Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Background:
The delivery of clinical care services using personalized health approaches is an integral component of cancer care. This review synthesized evidence on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of stepped-care interventions delivered to manage therapy-related symptoms in cancer populations compared with care as usual (CAU).
Methods:
Systematic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database, and EconLit to identify studies published from January 2010 to November 2024. Peer-reviewed studies that reported outcomes of stepped interventions and CAU were included, and quality appraisal was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 and the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomised Studies-of Interventions tools.
Results:
The review summarizes a total of 22 studies, involving 4588 unique adult cancer survivors. Fourteen studies identified statistically significant improvements in symptom severity and clinical outcomes comparable to those of CAU. The stepped-care group showed reduced mean severity scores for distress, insomnia, and fatigue, as well as improved stress reactions and emotional reactivity, and fewer palliative care visits. The low uptake of the intervention and inadequate assessment of comorbid symptoms have hindered the ability to draw conclusive recommendations across several studies. Four studies evaulated the cost-effectiveness of stepped-care interventions compared to CAU. Two of these studies reported significant cost savings of approximately €19 991 for each point improvement on the distress scale and lower incremental costs of approximately €3950 associated with stepped-care interventions.
Conclusions:
This review highlights the potential clinical and economic benefits of implementing stepped-care interventions to reduce the severity of cancer-related symptoms. Further research is warranted to assess the long-term effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and implementation feasibility of stepped-care interventions in real-world clinical care settings serving cancer populations with diverse needs.
More Related Videos
04:03Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Therapeutic Efficacy of Moving Cupping Along Meridians for Acute Exacerbation of COPD
Published on: September 27, 2024
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Management
Smoking Cessation
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...