AffiGrapher: Contrastive Heterogeneous Graph Learning with Aromatic Virtual Nodes for RNA-Small Molecule Binding
Junkai Wang1, Jian Wu2, Zhijun Zhang1
1School of Computer Science and Technology, Soochow University, Ganjiang East Streat 333, Jiangsu 215006, China.
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
|June 26, 2025
Summary
We developed AffiGrapher, a novel graph neural network, to predict RNA-small molecule binding affinity. This physics-driven approach improves accuracy and shows great potential for RNA-targeted drug discovery.
Area of Science:
- Biochemistry
- Computational Biology
- Drug Discovery
Background:
- RNA molecules are crucial drug targets due to their diverse structures and functions.
- Predicting RNA-small molecule binding affinity is difficult due to limited data and RNA conformational flexibility.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a robust computational method for predicting RNA-small molecule binding affinity.
- To enhance the accuracy and generalization of binding affinity predictions for RNA-targeted drug discovery.
Main Methods:
- Developed AffiGrapher, a physics-driven graph neural network integrating a physics-informed graph architecture with contrastive learning.
- Incorporated multiple RNA conformations to capture diverse structural information and improve prediction robustness.
- Evaluated model performance using rigorous cross-validation, cold-start settings, and multiscenario evaluations under structural uncertainty.
Main Results:
- AffiGrapher achieved state-of-the-art performance in binding affinity prediction across various validation schemes.
- Demonstrated strong generalization ability, even with predicted docking poses and unseen data.
- Showcased exceptional potential in virtual screening tasks for RNA-targeted drug discovery.
Conclusions:
- Integrating physics-based architectures with contrastive learning effectively addresses challenges in RNA-small molecule affinity prediction.
- AffiGrapher offers a powerful tool for accelerating RNA-targeted drug discovery.
- The method's robustness and generalization capabilities highlight its practical utility in computational drug design.
Related Concept Videos
Criteria for Aromaticity and the Hückel 4n + 2 Rule
14.9K
Like benzene, cyclobutadiene and cyclooctatetraene are cyclic compounds with alternate single and double bonds. However, their chemical behavior differs from benzene, as they are unstable and not aromatic. So, what are the structural characteristics of unsaturated compounds categorized as aromatic?
For the first time, Eric Hückel, a German chemical physicist, derived a set of structural features for a compound to be classified as aromatic. This is now known as Hückel’s rule or the 4n +...
For the first time, Eric Hückel, a German chemical physicist, derived a set of structural features for a compound to be classified as aromatic. This is now known as Hückel’s rule or the 4n +...
14.9K
Aromatic Compounds: Overview
15.7K
In general, the term ‘aromatic’ indicates a pleasant smell or fragrance from fresh flowers, freshly prepared coffee, etc. In the early history of organic chemistry, many benzene derivatives were isolated from the pleasant odor oils of the plants. For example, vanillin was isolated from the oil of vanilla, methyl salicylate from the oil of wintergreen, and cinnamaldehyde from the oil of cinnamon. They all had a pleasant odor; hence the name aromatic was given.
In 1825, Faraday isolated...
In 1825, Faraday isolated...
15.7K
Aromatic Hydrocarbon Anions: Structural Overview
4.3K
Neutral hydrocarbons like cyclopentadiene with an odd number of carbon atoms and one intervening CH2 group in the ring are not aromatic. Cyclopentadiene with 4 π electrons does not satisfy the 4n + 2 π electron rule. Additionally, the intervening CH2 group is sp3 hybridized and lacks a vacant p orbital, thereby interrupting the overlap of p orbitals in a continuous manner and preventing the delocalization of π electrons throughout the ring.
Due to the absence of continuous...
Due to the absence of continuous...
4.3K
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
66.1K
Noncovalent attractions are associations within and between molecules that influence the shape and structural stability of complexes. These interactions differ from covalent bonding in that they do not involve sharing of electrons.
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
66.1K
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
20.4K
No description available
20.4K
NMR Spectroscopy of Aromatic Compounds
6.7K
Aromatic compounds can be identified or analyzed using proton NMR and carbon‐13 NMR. Typically, aromatic hydrogens or hydrogens directly bonded to the aromatic rings are strongly deshielded by the aromatic ring current. Therefore, they absorb in the range of 6.5–8.0 ppm in proton NMR spectra. For instance, aromatic hydrogens directly bonded to the benzene ring absorb at 7.3 ppm. However, aromatic hydrogens of larger rings absorb farther upfield or downfield than the ideal range.
6.7K


