Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 18, 2025

Novel and Innovative Hybrid Technique for Type A Aortic Dissection
Published on: March 28, 2025
Challenges associated with chronic aortic dissections: single-center experience of iliac branch devices in chronic
David Khangholi1, Christos Vrettos1, Nikolaos Konstantinou1
1Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Munich, LMU Munich, München, Germany.
Insights
Iliac branch devices (IBDs) show high technical success for chronic aortic dissections, leading to significant aneurysm shrinkage and preserved pelvic perfusion. Despite off-label use, outcomes are acceptable in experienced centers, though complications highlight the need for careful perioperative care.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Endovascular Interventions
- Aortic Aneurysm Treatment
Background:
- Chronic aortic dissections extending into iliac arteries pose significant anatomical and procedural challenges.
- Iliac branch devices (IBDs) offer a potential solution for preserving pelvic perfusion and excluding the false lumen in these complex cases.
- Current use of IBDs in dissected aortoiliac anatomy is off-label and requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety, technical success, and mid-term outcomes of using IBDs in patients with chronic post-dissection aneurysms.
- To assess aneurysm remodeling and preservation of pelvic perfusion following IBD implantation.
- To identify factors influencing mortality, endoleaks, occlusions, and reinterventions.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective single-center study of patients treated with IBDs for chronic aortoiliac dissections (2016-2024).
- Analysis of preoperative anatomy, procedural details, and clinical outcomes including technical success, aneurysm shrinkage, mortality, endoleaks, occlusions, and reinterventions.
- Primary endpoints: technical success and aneurysm shrinkage. Secondary endpoints: mortality, IBD-related complications, and reinterventions.
Main Results:
- 100% technical success in 38 IBD implantations across 28 patients; 53% performed with f/bEVAR.
- Significant aneurysm shrinkage observed in all segments (aorta, bifurcation, CIA) (P≤0.004).
- 36-month freedom from endoleak: 76%, occlusion: 91%, reintervention: 75%. Overall survival: 96% at 12 months, 86% at 36 months, 62% at 60 months. Four IBD occlusions and eight reinterventions occurred.
Conclusions:
- IBDs demonstrate high technical success, favorable aneurysm remodeling, and sustained pelvic perfusion in complex chronic aortic dissections.
- Off-label use of IBDs in experienced centers yields acceptable complication rates, though clinical complications (39%) necessitate meticulous perioperative care.
- Further prospective multicenter studies are essential for optimizing patient selection, device design, and validating these findings.
Background:
Chronic aortic dissections extending into the iliac arteries present unique anatomical and procedural challenges. Iliac branch devices (IBDs) offer the potential to preserve pelvic perfusion and achieve distal false lumen exclusion, yet their use in dissected anatomies remains off-label and insufficiently studied. This study evaluates the safety, technical success, and mid-term outcomes of IBDs in patients with chronic post-dissection aneurysms.
Methods:
This retrospective single-center study included all patients treated with IBDs (Zenith® Branch Endovascular Graft-Iliac Bifurcation, Cook Medical Bloomington, IN, USA) for chronic aortoiliac dissections between 2016 and 2024. Preoperative anatomy, procedural details, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Primary endpoints were technical success and aneurysm shrinkage. Secondary endpoints included mortality, IBD-related endoleaks, occlusions and reinterventions.
Results:
A total of 38 IBDs were implanted in 28 patients (mean age 59±11 years, 89% male). In 53% of cases, IBD implantation was performed simultaneously with f/bEVAR. Technical success was achieved in 100% of procedures. Aneurysm shrinkage was observed in all measured segments, with a mean reduction of 4.9 mm in the aorta, 5.4 mm at the aortic bifurcation, and 6.7 mm in the CIA (each P≤0.004). Estimated overall survival was 96% at 12 months and 86% at 36 months, declining to 62% at 60 months. Freedom from IBD-related endoleaks was 76%, from occlusion 91%, and from reintervention 75% at 36 months, with most adverse events clustering in the first year and event curves plateauing thereafter. A total of four IBD-related occlusions and eight reinterventions were recorded during follow-up. One early case of spinal cord ischemia after acute complicated type B dissection with contained rupture and one late case following embolic IIA branch occlusion were observed. General clinical complications occurred in 39% of patients, mainly due to hospital-acquired infections and acute kidney injury. Exploratory regression identified age, chronic kidney disease, aortic diameter, and pelvic tortuosity as predictors of overall mortality; custom-made IBDs predicted sac shrinkage, while self-expanding bridging stents and distal IIA relining were associated with occlusion.
Conclusions:
In anatomically complex and predominantly younger patients, IBDs offer high technical success, favorable aneurysm remodeling and sustained preservation of pelvic perfusion. Despite their off-label use, endoleak, occlusion and reintervention rates remain acceptable when performed in experienced centers. The high rate of clinical complications reflects the complexity of simultaneous multilevel aortic repair and underscores the importance of meticulous perioperative care in this high-risk population. Further prospective multicenter studies are needed to validate these findings and optimize patient selection and device design for this complex pathology.
More Related Videos
04:56Modified Octopus Technique for Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Published on: August 1, 2025
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies