Feasibility of a safe innovation framework for crop breeding

Marc Groenen1, Gijs W Spaans1, Lianne M S Bouwman1

  • 1Wageningen Food Safety Research (WFSR), Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

GM Crops & Food
|June 26, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Stakeholders in plant breeding prefer a self-regulated safety framework for biotechnological innovations. This approach, guided by government and researchers, led to the draft "Safe Innovation in Plant breeding (SIP) Framework" focusing on food safety.

Related Concept Videos

Plant Breeding and Biotechnology01:59

Plant Breeding and Biotechnology

Crop cultivation has a long history in human civilization, with records showing the cultivation of cereal plants beginning at around 8000 BC. This early plant breeding was developed primarily to provide a steady supply of food.
19.8K
Plant Tissue Culture02:57

Plant Tissue Culture

Plant tissue culture is widely used in both primary and applied science. Applications range from plant development studies to functional gene studies, crop improvement, commercial micropropagation, virus elimination, and conservation of rare species.
38.6K
Transgenic Plants02:50

Transgenic Plants

Recombinant DNA technology called transgenesis is often used to add a foreign gene or remove a detrimental gene from an organism. Such genetically modified organisms are called transgenic organisms.
The first-ever transgenic plant was a tobacco plant developed in 1983 that showed resistance against the tobacco mosaic virus. Since then, many transgenic plants have been developed and commercialized for improving the agricultural, ornamental, and horticultural value of a crop plant. Transgenic...
7.4K
What is Genetic Engineering?00:49

What is Genetic Engineering?

Overview
75.6K
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?01:17

Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
28.4K