Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Chi-square Analysis02:46

Chi-square Analysis

28.9K
The chi-square test is a statistical hypothesis test. It is used to check whether there is a significant difference between an expected value and an observed value. In the context of genetics, it enables us to either accept or reject a hypothesis, based on how much the observed values deviate from the expected values.
The chi-square test was developed by Pearson in 1990.
The first step of performing a Chi-square analysis is to establish a null hypothesis, which assumes that there is no real...
28.9K
Classification of Illness01:17

Classification of Illness

9.4K
The meaning of illness is individualized to each person who experiences an alteration in health. In contrast, disease is a medical term indicating a pathological change in the structure and function of the body or mind. It is a condition that has specific symptoms and boundaries.
An illness is a response to a disease in which the person's level of functioning is changed compared with a previous level. The general classification of illness includes acute and chronic.
Acute illness is severe...
9.4K
Finding Critical Values for Chi-Square01:18

Finding Critical Values for Chi-Square

3.4K
Consider a curve representing sample data drawn randomly from a normally distributed population. One must construct confidence intervals to estimate or to test a claim regarding the population standard deviation. For example, a 95% confidence interval covers 95% of the area under the curve, and the remaining 5% is equally distributed on either side of the curve. To achieve such confidence intervals, one must determine the critical values. The critical values are simply the values separating the...
3.4K
Test for Homogeneity01:23

Test for Homogeneity

1.7K
The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can...
1.7K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.7K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated with glass yttrium-90 radioembolization: A histopathologic study.

European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging·2026
Same author

The International Medical Graduate Paradox.

Annals of surgery·2026
Same author

Radiation Segmentectomy versus Combined Chemoembolization plus Microwave Ablation: Histopathologic Tumor Necrosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Measuring up to 5 cm.

Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR·2026
Same author

Enhancing Graduate Surgical Education: Recommendations for Development of Common Surgery Education and Training Accreditation Standards.

Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches·2026
Same author

Factors and Outcomes Associated With Cardiac Complications Among Patients Undergoing Elective Major Abdominal Surgery.

The American surgeon·2026
Same author

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Epigastric Pain.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 2, 2026

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
10:38

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies

Published on: January 16, 2019

22.0K

Validation of the uChicago Health Inequity Classification System (CHI-CS): A multi-institution pilot study.

Alexander Z Wang1, J Michael Millis2, Aleah R Booker1

  • 1University of Chicago Pritzker School of Meicine, Chicago, IL.

Surgery
|June 26, 2025
PubMed
Summary

The uChicago Health Inequity Classification System effectively addresses bias and access in surgical complications. This tool enhances discussions and clinical practice, promoting health equity in surgical care.

More Related Videos

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.0K
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

3.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 2, 2026

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
10:38

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies

Published on: January 16, 2019

22.0K
Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.0K
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

3.2K

Area of Science:

  • Health Equity Research
  • Surgical Quality Improvement
  • Medical Education

Background:

  • Health inequities disproportionately affect marginalized populations within the U.S. healthcare system.
  • The uChicago Health Inequity Classification System (UHICS) was developed to standardize discussions on bias and access in surgical morbidity and mortality conferences.
  • This study aimed to assess the impact and generalizability of the UHICS beyond its initial single-institution pilot.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of the uChicago Health Inequity Classification System in multi-institutional settings.
  • To assess the system's impact on faculty and trainee comfort and practice regarding health inequities in surgery.
  • To validate findings from the initial pilot study in diverse clinical environments.

Main Methods:

  • Three institutions implemented the UHICS for at least six months, collecting morbidity and mortality data.
  • Pre- and post-intervention surveys measured understanding and comfort discussing bias and access.
  • Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare pre- and post-intervention survey responses.

Main Results:

  • Bias and/or access were identified as contributing factors in 27% of surgical complications across the participating sites.
  • Post-implementation, participants reported significantly increased comfort in recognizing and discussing bias and access-related complications.
  • The UHICS enhanced morbidity and mortality conferences for 89% of respondents, increasing discussions on health equity's impact.

Conclusions:

  • The uChicago Health Inequity Classification System is generalizable and effective in diverse surgical settings.
  • The system serves as a valuable tool for advancing health equity in surgical care.
  • Further research is recommended to explore the UHICS in varied practice environments.