Validation of the uChicago Health Inequity Classification System (CHI-CS): A multi-institution pilot study
Alexander Z Wang1, J Michael Millis2, Aleah R Booker1
1University of Chicago Pritzker School of Meicine, Chicago, IL.
Background:
Health inequities permeate the American health care system, disproportionately impacting marginalized patients. The uChicago Health Inequity Classification System was developed in 2021 to facilitate structured discussions on bias and access at surgical morbidity and mortality conferences. This study sought to understand uChicago Health Inequity Classification System's impact and validate findings from the single-institution pilot study.
Methods:
Three geographically disparate institutions implemented uChicago Health Inequity Classification System for at least 6 months and aggregated deidentified morbidity and mortality data during this time. A preintervention survey gauged faculty and trainee understanding and comfort discussing bias and access's role in surgical complications. Six months later, a postintervention survey evaluated uChicago Health Inequity Classification System's impact on morbidity and mortality and clinical practice. Pre- and post-intervention responses were compared using Kruskal-Wallis tests (P ≤ .05).
Results:
The pre- and postintervention survey response rates were 25% (98 respondents) and 16% (64 respondents), respectively. Across sites, bias and/or access contributed to 27% (34/125) of morbidity and mortality complications. Post-implementation, participants were significantly more comfortable recognizing bias- (P < .001) and access-related (P = .05) complications and discussing bias (P < .001) and access (P = .02) as causes for complications when assessed using Likert scales. uChicago Health Inequity Classification System enhanced morbidity and mortality for 89% of respondents, increased discussions of bias and access's impact on surgical outcomes (70%), influenced clinical practice and decision-making (46%), and was associated with perceived improvement in patient outcomes (24%).
Conclusion:
Findings of this study were consistent with the single-institution pilot, demonstrating uChicago Health Inequity Classification System's generalizability and potential as a useful tool for promoting health equity in surgery. Future studies should explore its use across diverse practice settings.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Chi-square Analysis
The chi-square test was developed by Pearson in 1990.
The first step of performing a Chi-square analysis is to establish a null hypothesis, which assumes that there is no real...
Classification of Illness
An illness is a response to a disease in which the person's level of functioning is changed compared with a previous level. The general classification of illness includes acute and chronic.
Acute illness is severe...
Finding Critical Values for Chi-Square
Test for Homogeneity
Bias in Epidemiological Studies


