Predictive modeling for early detection of refractory esophageal stricture following esophageal atresia surgery:
Chuanping Xie1, Dingding Wang1, An Wang1
1Department of Neonatal Surgery, Beijing Childrens Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, No. 56 Nalishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100045, China.
Background:
Refractory esophageal stricture (RES) presents a challenging complication after esophageal atresia (EA) repair. Earlier identification of patients with RES could help clinical decision-making. However, there are currently limited articles to predict the occurrence of RES after EA repair.
Methods:
All patients diagnosed with esophageal strictures (ES) who underwent primary endoscopic balloon dilations (EBD) after EA repair in our institution between January 2017 to December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. They were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of suffering RES to analyze the risk factors for developing RES after EA repair and construct a predictive model using the machine learning (ML) method, based on the baseline characteristics, early postoperative complications, and ES features at the first EBD.
Results:
92 patients were included in our study, including the RES group (n = 59) and the non-RES group (n = 33). In terms of patient demographics, multivariate analysis revealed that LGEA (p = 0.021), and anastomosis leak (p = 0.016) were the risk factors for developing RES after EA repair. Further analysis of the stricture characteristics after EA repair between the two groups revealed that esophageal stricture at a two-thirds lower level (p = 0.006), eccentric esophageal stenosis (p = 0.048), and a higher upper pouch stricture index (U-SI) (p = 0.011) emerged as significant risk factors for developing RES following EA repair. Then, we constructed ML models for predicting RES following LEAP based on patient demographics and stricture characteristics. Among all the ML models, the decision tree (DET), random forest (RF), and multilayer perceptron (MLP) models demonstrated perfect predictive value in the validation set. Among them, the RF model showed the highest average AUC in the training set (AUC = 0.756, 95% CI: 0.584-0.928), indicating better reproducibility. Subsequently, we used Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) to interpret the most important features and found that U-SI, rTEF, stricture level, and anastomotic leakage were identified as the most important predictive features. Furthermore, an RF-based clinical decision support system was deployed, providing dynamic visualization for predicting RES.
Conclusion:
LGEA, anastomosis leak, lower stricture level, eccentric stricture, and higher U-SI value were risk factors for RES after EA repair. By utilizing the ML predictive model, we could efficiently and accurately predict the occurrence of RES.
More Related Videos
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018
05:57ADSC-sheet Transplantation to Prevent Stricture after Extended Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Published on: February 10, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Barrett Esophagus-I: Introduction
This constant acid exposure transforms the esophagus's pink mucosal lining (stratified squamous epithelium) into a type of lining more...
