Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 18, 2025

Determination of the Friction Coefficients of Icy Pavements Under Different Amounts of Snowfall
Published on: January 6, 2023
Selecting the Optimal Calculation Method and Chemical Reagents in Surface Energy Tests of Asphalt Materials
Longchang Niu1,2, Chongzhi Tu1, Gongying Ding1
1School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuyi University, Jiangmen 529020, China.
None:
In surface energy tests of asphalt materials, the inaccuracy of the calculation method (e.g., least squares (LS)) and the arbitrary selection of chemical reagent combinations lead to unstable results, threatening the quantitative evaluation of asphalt-aggregate adhesion durability. This study addresses these two scientific deficiencies with the following findings: (1) when simultaneous equations are used to calculate the asphalt surface energy parameters, the total least squares method should be used instead of the classical least squares method to reduce the fitting error; (2) the selection of the reagent combination should be based on which one is the most rational in terms of the physical characterization, leap degree, abnormal values, and other requirements, and the reagent combination with the fewest abnormal values should be chosen as the best scheme. The results show that (1) compared with the classical least squares method, the total least squares method reduces the fitting error between the calculated and real values of asphalt surface energy parameters and improves the accuracy and stability of the calculation results; (2) the best reagent combination scheme is WFSD (distilled water + formamide + dimethyl sulfoxide + diiodomethane). The calculated values of asphalt surface energy parameters were more accurate and reasonable, and the calculation results had no abnormal values. Compared with WFEG (distilled water + formamide + ethylene glycol + glycerol), the error rate of the reagent combination scheme WFSD in calculating the total surface energy of two kinds of asphalt was reduced by 17.71% and 64.80%, respectively. These findings establish a reliable framework for the accurate quantification of surface energy, addressing the critical issue of reagent-dependent variability in the results and strengthening the scientific basis for evaluating the durability of asphalt pavement.
Related Concept Videos
Fineness of Cement
Direct...
Toughness and Hardness of Aggregate
Measurement of Air Content in Concrete
The pressure method,...

