Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Microstate and Omega Complexity Analyses of the Resting-state Electroencephalography
Published on: June 15, 2018
Difference between eyes-open and eyes-closed resting state quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) for predicting
Chanda Simfukwe1, Seong Soo A An1, Young Chul Youn2,3
1Department of Bionano Technology, Gachon University, Seongnam-si, South Korea.
Deep learning models analyzing quantitative EEG (qEEG) time-frequency images effectively detect mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Comparing eyes-open resting (EOR) and eyes-closed resting (ECR) states shows promise for early dementia detection.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Medical Imaging
- Artificial Intelligence
Background:
- Electroencephalography (EEG) records brain's electrical activity, offering insights into cerebral cortex function.
- Quantitative EEG (qEEG) analysis of EEG signals serves as a neurophysiological indicator for early dementia detection.
- Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) represent significant challenges in neurological research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce a deep learning (DL) classification approach for detecting MCI and AD.
- To utilize the difference between eyes-open resting (EOR) and eyes-closed resting (ECR) qEEG time-frequency (TF) images as input features.
- To evaluate the efficacy of DL models in differentiating between normal controls (NC), MCI, and AD subjects.
Main Methods:
- A dataset of 16,910 qEEG TF images from 890 subjects (NC, MCI, AD) was analyzed.
- EEG signals were converted to qEEG TF images using Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) across five frequency sub-bands.
- A convolutional neural network (CNN) within a DL framework processed TF images and age data for classification.
Main Results:
- The DL model differentiating NC versus cognitive impairment (CI = MCI + AD) achieved an AUC of 0.95, accuracy of 0.93, sensitivity of 0.97, and specificity of 0.92.
- Performance for NC versus AD classification was an AUC of 0.88, accuracy of 0.88, sensitivity of 0.89, and specificity of 0.86.
- For NC versus MCI classification, the model achieved an AUC of 0.85, accuracy of 0.83, sensitivity of 0.90, and specificity of 0.81.
Conclusions:
- The difference between EOR and ECR qEEG states provides a practical method for detecting cognitive impairment using DL.
- The developed DL models can serve as a decision-support system for clinicians in the early diagnosis of cognitive impairment.
- This approach offers a potential supportive reference for dementia research and clinical practice.
More Related Videos
06:37Electroencephalography Network Indices as Biomarkers of Upper Limb Impairment in Chronic Stroke
Published on: July 14, 2023
07:26Characterizing the Relationship Between Eye Movement Parameters and Cognitive Functions in Non-demented Parkinson's Disease Patients with Eye Tracking
Published on: September 26, 2019