Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Modeling and Evaluation of Murine Diabetic Cardiomyopathy Model
Published on: November 29, 2024
A Responsible Framework for Assessing, Selecting, and Explaining Machine Learning Models in Cardiovascular Disease
Yang Yang1, Che-Yi Liao1, Esmaeil Keyvanshokooh2
1H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 765 Ferst Dr NW, Atlanta, GA, 30332-0001, United States, 1 404-385-3140.
This study introduces a 3-stage machine learning framework to develop trustworthy clinical models. The GLMnet model balances predictive accuracy and fairness for cardiovascular disease risk prediction in type 2 diabetes patients.
Area of Science:
- Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Clinical Predictive Modeling
- Health Informatics
Background:
- Trustworthy machine learning (ML) in clinical practice requires interpretability, explainability, and fairness.
- Interpretability alone does not guarantee explainability, which provides insights into model predictions.
- Current ML evaluation often prioritizes accuracy over broader trustworthiness aspects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a 3-stage ML framework for responsible model development: assessment, selection, and explanation.
- To apply this framework for predicting cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes (myocardial infarction and stroke) in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients.
- To evaluate the trade-offs between predictive accuracy and fairness in ML models.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the ACCORD dataset (N=9635) of T2D patients, including demographic, clinical, and biomarker data.
- Developed interpretable ML models (linear, tree-based, ensemble) using hold-out cross-validation.
- Assessed models using accuracy (AUC) and fairness (RPPS) metrics, quantifying trade-offs and employing SHAP and partial dependence plots for explainability.
Main Results:
- The GLMnet model demonstrated the best balance of performance and fairness for predicting myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke.
- GLMnet achieved high Relative Parity of Performance Scores (RPPS) for gender and race, indicating minimal disparities.
- Key predictors identified: history of CVD and age for MI; HbA1c and systolic blood pressure for stroke.
Conclusions:
- Established a responsible framework for ML model assessment, selection, and explanation, focusing on accuracy-fairness trade-offs.
- Highlighted that simpler models can match complex ensembles, but accuracy disparities across groups require attention.
- Emphasized the need for holistic approaches integrating accuracy, fairness, and explainability for enhanced healthcare technology adoption.
Related Concept Videos
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...

