Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
Published on: July 29, 2013
Patient-specific organ dose and in-vivo image quality assessment in clinical CT
Wanyi Fu1, Shobhit Sharma2, Justin Solomon3
1Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Labs, and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Purpose:
To develop and characterize individualized dose and quality measures at organ level compared to their generic counterparts across a clinical CT dataset.
Materials And Methods:
The study included 9801 chest-abdomen-pelvis and abdomen-pelvis CT exams (7,763 patients, mean age, 56 ± 17 years; 4113 women) representing 20 unique protocols. For each exam, patient-specific organ dose of all radiosensitive organs was estimated using a validated method by generating personalized computational phantoms and Monte Carlo simulations. Effective dose (EOD) was calculated by weighted sum of the organ doses. Liver dose, ODliver, noise in the liver, Nliver, and observer model detectability, d', were assessed within the liver as examples of individualized, organ-based image assessment measurements. The organ-based measurements (ODliver, EOD, and Nliver) were compared to their generic counterparts: ssize-specific ddose estimates (SSDE), effective dose based on dose length product (EDLP), and whole-body noise (Nglobal), respectively.
Results:
Generic dose values were substantially higher than individualized estimates for SSDE vs. ODliver (median of all exams: 51.2 %, p < 0.001) and EDLP vs. EDOD (median: 41.0 %, p < 0.001). Nglobal was generally lower than Nliver (median: -7.2 %, p < 0.001). The correlation relationships of EOD and d' were substantially varied (R2 range: 0-0.5) for different patient sizes and scan parameters.
Conclusions:
Demonstrated across a population of exams, individualized organ-based measurements of dose and quality are feasible. Generic measures cannot fully represent individualized organ-based values. The correlation relationships between individualized dose and image quality values varies for different vendors and protocols, implying imaging optimization is best when done semi-independently for each factor using individualized measurements.
More Related Videos
09:49A Whole Body Dosimetry Protocol for Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy PRRT: 2D Planar Image and Hybrid 2D+3D SPECT/CT Image Methods
Published on: April 24, 2020
08:41Novel In Vivo Micro-Computed Tomography Imaging Techniques for Assessing the Progression of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Published on: March 24, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT