Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Assessment of Social Transmission of Food Preferences Behaviors
Published on: January 25, 2018
Patient-Provider Communication Among U.S. Adults With Food Insecurity
Sungchul Park1, Seth A Berkowitz2
1Department of Health Policy and Management, College of Health Science, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; BK21 FOUR R&E Center for Learning Health Systems, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Introduction:
Food-insecure adults may experience poor patient-provider communication, potentially compromising care delivery, but this remains unclear. This study examined whether food-insecure adults face poorer patient-provider communication than food-secure adults and how this interplay affects access to care, healthcare utilization, and financial burden of care.
Methods:
This study used data from the 2016, 2017, and 2021 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Outcomes included patient-provider communication, access to care, healthcare utilization, and financial burden of care. Key independent variables were patient-provider communication and food insecurity. Analysis was conducted in September 2024.
Results:
Food-insecure adults reported poorer patient-provider communication than food-secure adults, with 9.0% (95% CI=7.7, 10.3) and 56.0% (95% CI=53.9, 58.2) reporting low and moderate communication among food-insecure adults vs 4.3% (95% CI=4.1, 4.6) and 50.7% (95% CI=50.0, 51.4) reporting low and moderate communication among food-secure adults. Furthermore, food insecurity was associated with lower access to care, higher emergency departments visits, and greater financial burdens, particularly among adults with low communication. Among adults with low communication, the likelihood of having a usual source of care was lower for food-insecure adults than for food-secure adults: 69.9% (95% CI=61.3, 78.6) vs 84.2% (95% CI=79.8, 88.6). Among adults with low communication, food-insecure adults had higher rates of emergency department visits (40.2%; 95% CI=34.5, 45.8 vs 20.1%; 95% CI=17.6, 22.6) and reported experiencing problems in paying medical bills (43.7%; 95% CI=37.6, 49.8 vs 20.1%; 95% CI=17.6, 22.6) compared with food-secure adults.
Conclusions:
These results underscore the complex healthcare needs of food-insecure populations and highlight the need to enhance communication strategies to effectively address.
More Related Videos
04:46'Boden Food Plate': Novel Interactive Web-based Method for the Assessment of Dietary Intake
Published on: September 18, 2018
03:35Determining Gender-Based Differences in Retinal and Choroidal Thickness in Underweight Individuals via Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: December 1, 2023
Related Concept Videos
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Health Literacy
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process II: Planning and Implementation
Taste Buds and Receptors
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include: