Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

An Image Guided Transapical Mitral Valve Leaflet Puncture Model of Controlled Volume Overload from Mitral Regurgitation in the Rat
Published on: May 19, 2020
Prognostic Implications of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics in Primary Mitral Regurgitation
Alexandre Altes1, Vincent Hanet2, David Vancraeynest2
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc, Pôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire (CARD), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; GCS-Groupement des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille/Lille Catholic Hospitals, Heart Valve Center, Cardiology Department, ETHICS EA 7446, DataCoeur, Lille Catholic University, Lille, France.
Background:
Knowledge remains limited regarding the relationship between cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) preoperative characteristics and postoperative clinical outcomes in primary mitral regurgitation (MR).
Objectives:
The authors assessed the prognostic value of CMR preoperative characteristics in patients with primary MR due to prolapse or flail undergoing mitral valve surgery.
Methods:
We retrospectively studied 284 patients (median age 61 years, 24% women) with chronic significant primary MR, who underwent CMR and echocardiography (echo) prior to mitral valve repair surgery. The endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, hospitalization for heart failure, stroke, or life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia.
Results:
Over a median follow-up of 7.3 years (Q1-Q3: 3.4-10.5), adverse events occurred in 36 (13%) patients. CMR-left atrial emptying fraction (LAEF) (HR: 1.84 [95% CI: 1.32-2.56]; P < 0.001), CMR-right ventricular ejection fraction (HR: 1.36 [95% CI: 1.00-1.84]; P = 0.047), and CMR-indexed aortic forward stroke volume (HR: 1.40 [95% CI: 0.99-2]; P = 0.059) were each associated with a higher risk of adverse outcomes (HR for decrease in 1 SD). After adjusting for clinical and imaging risk factors, reduced CMR-LAEF remained independently associated with adverse prognosis (adjusted HR: 1.78 [95% CI: 1.27-2.48]; P < 0.001). Patients with CMR-LAEF <30% had higher 5-year event rates (28% vs 4%; P < 0.001) and were at a substantially higher risk of adverse outcomes (adjusted HR: 3.78 [95% CI: 1.83-7.80]; P < 0.001), with added prognostic value confirmed by multiple performance model metrics.
Conclusions:
In patients with primary MR, among CMR and echo preoperative characteristics, reduced CMR-LAEF, with a threshold value of 30%, is markedly associated with an increased risk of postoperative adverse outcomes.
More Related Videos
08:31A Simplified Stepwise Approach to Echo Guidance during Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair
Published on: October 16, 2021
11:50High-frequency High-resolution Echocardiography: First Evidence on Non-invasive Repeated Measure of Myocardial Strain, Contractility, and Mitral Regurgitation in the Ischemia-reperfused Murine Heart
Published on: July 9, 2010
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests