Minimally invasive approach for inguinoscrotal hernia repair. A systematic literature review

Andrea Balla1,2, Alberto Sartori3, Monica Ortenzi4

  • 1Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Virgen Macarena, University of Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.

Abstract

Insights

Minimally invasive surgery for inguinoscrotal hernias (ISHs) presents challenges. Totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair is not recommended due to higher complication and recurrence rates compared to transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Innovation
  • Gastroenterology
  • Hernia Repair

Background:

  • Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is increasingly explored for inguinoscrotal hernias (ISHs).
  • Evidence on the outcomes of MIS for ISH repair is still evolving.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review current evidence on MIS for ISH treatment.
  • To compare the outcomes of different MIS techniques for ISH repair.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases.
  • PROSPERO registration (CRD42023493129).
  • Inclusion of 1052 patients undergoing transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) or totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair.

Main Results:

  • TAPP was performed in 78.3% of patients, TEP in 21.7%.
  • Complication rates were 2.5% for TAPP and 12.3% for TEP intraoperatively.
  • Postoperative complication rates were 23.4% for TAPP and 54.4% for TEP. Overall recurrence rate was 1.6% (1.3% TAPP, 2.8% TEP).

Conclusions:

  • MIS for ISH repair is technically demanding.
  • TEP repair is associated with higher postoperative complications, conversion rates, and recurrences, suggesting it should be avoided for ISH.
  • TAPP appears to be a safer MIS option for ISH repair.

Related Concept Videos