Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Social vulnerability indices for proactively identifying at-risk individuals in healthcare: a systematic review
Gitte Valentin1,2, Pernille Pedersen1,2, Thomas Maribo1,2
1DEFACTUM, Evald Krogs gade 16A, Aarhus N, 8000, Denmark.
Abstract:
Social vulnerability indices (SVIs) have the potential to guide risk stratification and support socially differentiated interventions to improve healthcare equity. However, their applicability in clinical settings remains uncertain. This systematic review synthesizes evidence from individual-level SVIs, focusing on (1) how social vulnerability is defined, (2) the domains and items covered, and (3) their ability to predict poor health outcomes. We searched the Medline, PsycInfo, Embase, and Web of Science databases from inception to 31 January 2024 for studies linking individual-based SVIs with poor health outcomes in adult populations in Europe, North America, and Australasia. Data were extracted independently by two authors, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. A narrative synthesis addressed the review's aims, with thematic synthesis for the first two and a vote-counting approach for the third. Most SVIs included domains like income, social support, living situation, and educational attainment, with over 50% covering these factors. A consistent association was found between higher social vulnerability and poorer health outcomes. However, none of the identified SVIs were prospectively tested in clinical settings. The overall certainty of evidence was assessed as low due to retrospective study designs and significant heterogeneity. This review highlights the potential of SVIs to predict poor health outcomes, though their lack of prospective validation limits current use. Future research should focus on adapting and testing SVIs that prioritize key socioeconomic and social support domains while adopting a simple and pragmatic approach.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
07:51Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Ethical Standards I
The Code of Ethics provisions outline the nurse's duty to the patient, the healthcare team, the profession, and society. The Code's fundamental principles include advocacy,...
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...