Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
Published on: March 2, 2011
Debate About the Free Testosterone Hypothesis: Useful Tool or Misguided Mirage?
Bradley D Anawalt1, David J Handelsman2
1Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Box 356420, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Abstract:
In this debate, 2 clinicians discuss the merits and demerits of the free testosterone hypothesis. Although most clinical guidelines recommend the measurement of free testosterone in the evaluation for male hypogonadism (at least in men with suspected low serum sex hormone-binding globulin), there remains controversy about the underlying hypothesis that serum free testosterone is a significant contributor to androgen effect. In this debate, Dr. Anawalt presents evidence to support the free testosterone hypothesis and advocates for the usefulness of accurate assessment of free testosterone in the evaluation of male hypogonadism. Dr. Handelsman argues that the evidence is unconvincing, the hypothesis is flawed and biologically invalid, and free testosterone cannot be accurately assessed in clinical practice.
Related Concept Videos
Testosterone: Functions and Regulation
Regression Toward the Mean
Statistical Hypothesis Testing
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...

