Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
External validation of the systematic coronary risk evaluation 2 (SCORE2) and SCORE2-older persons in cancer patients
Mari Nordbø Gynnild1,2, Joris Holtrop3, Steven H J Hageman3
1Clinic of Cardiology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Aims:
The 2022 European Society of Cardiology cardio-oncology guidelines recommend cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk stratification for cancer patients and suggest using SCORE2 and SCORE2-OP. However, these models have not been validated or specifically adapted for cancer populations. Our aim was to refine the SCORE2 and SCORE2-OP models to accurately predict 10-year fatal and non-fatal CVD risk in cancer patients.
Methods And Results:
We included 1622 patients from the HUNT3 study (2006-08) who were diagnosed with cancer within 4 years after their enrolment and followed until 2023 linked to national registries. The primary outcome was a composite of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or CVD mortality. Model performance was assessed using Harrel's C-statistic and calibration curves. Both models were recalibrated by applying a multiplicative adjustment factor based on expected-observed (E/O) ratios. The most prevalent cancers were gastrointestinal (23%), prostate (17%), and breast (14%). Mean age was 65.2 years, 52% were female. During a median follow-up of 8.8 years [inter-quartile range 1.9-12.6], 252 CVD events (39% MI, 36% stroke, 25% CVD deaths) and 708 non-CVD deaths occurred. SCORE2 initially underestimated CVD risk (E/O ratio for men and women: 0.91 and 0.63, respectively) but showed adequate agreement after recalibration. C-statistics for SCORE2 was 0.693 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.643-0.743], and 0.730 (95% CI 0.676-0.784) after excluding those not surviving the first 2 years. For SCORE2-OP, the C-statistics were 0.586 (95% CI 0.529-0.643) and 0.648 (95% CI 0.577-0.720).
Conclusion:
SCORE2 underestimated CVD risk in cancer patients. After recalibration, the model may serve as a valuable tool for risk stratification in cancer patients.
More Related Videos
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
06:57Author Spotlight: Advancing Cardiovascular Imaging - Introducing the Spatially Weighted Calcium Score for Early Disease Detection
Published on: September 22, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System II: Inspection
Head and Neck
Cancer Survival Analysis
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)