Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

12:18
Subcutaneous Infection of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus MRSA
Published on: February 9, 2011
23.1K
Reliability of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Nasal Swab Screening for Predicting MRSA Burn
Max L Silverstein1,2, Yvonne Karanas1,2, Clifford C Sheckter1,2
1Regional Burn Center, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, CA 95128, United States.
Summary
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal swabs can predict burn wound culture results. A negative nasal swab strongly suggests a burn infection is not caused by MRSA, allowing for de-escalation of antibiotic therapy.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Burn Care
- Microbiology
Background:
- Infections are a leading cause of mortality in burn patients, with soft tissue infections being a significant source of sepsis.
- Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is prevalent in burn units, often necessitating empiric vancomycin treatment.
- Nasal swab screening for MRSA colonization aids in infection control and decontamination strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the utility of MRSA nasal swab screening in predicting MRSA presence in burn wound cultures.
- To determine the diagnostic accuracy of MRSA nasal swabs for infected burns.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 250 burn patients undergoing weekly MRSA nasal swab screening and developing infections over 36 months.
- Comparison of nasal swab results with bacterial cultures from infected burn wounds.
- Calculation of test performance metrics: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).
Main Results:
- MRSA nasal swabs demonstrated a sensitivity of 64.1%, specificity of 96.2%, PPV of 75.8%, and NPV of 93.5%.
- Nasal swabs were more sensitive in predicting community-acquired MRSA infections (66.7% positive) than hospital-acquired infections (55.6% positive).
- A negative nasal swab result indicates a low likelihood of MRSA-caused burn infections.
Conclusions:
- MRSA nasal swab screening is a valuable tool for predicting MRSA in burn wound infections.
- The high NPV supports de-escalating MRSA antibiotic coverage in patients with negative nasal swab results.
- Universal MRSA nasal screening should be implemented in burn centers to guide antimicrobial therapy decisions.
Related Concept Videos
Staphylococcal Skin Infections
150
Staphylococcus aureus is a Gram-positive coccus that resides harmlessly on the skin and mucous membranes of healthy individuals. When the skin barrier is breached, it can shift from a commensal to an opportunistic pathogen. This transition is facilitated by surface adhesins, such as clumping factor B and S. aureus surface protein G (SasG), which bind to structural proteins, including loricrin and cytokeratin, in the damaged epidermis. Protein A, another key factor, binds the Fc region of...
150
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
251
Antibiotic resistance in bacteria arises when microorganisms evolve the ability to withstand drugs designed to kill them or inhibit their growth, rendering once-effective treatments useless. This phenomenon, driven by genetic change and selection under antibiotic exposure, poses a profound threat to modern medicine. Mechanisms include drug-inactivating enzymes (e.g., β-lactamases), efflux pumps that eject antibiotics, mutations altering antibiotic targets, decreased drug uptake, and...
251
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
115
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) presents a critical public health threat, arising from its capacity to resist β-lactam antibiotics due to acquisition of the mecA gene within the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec). This gene encodes penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a), which impairs binding efficacy of methicillin and other β-lactams. MRSA has evolved into distinct clonal lineages impacting humans and animals alike, reinforcing its significance within...
115

