Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
Published on: April 17, 2020
Musculoskeletal Outcomes Following Thoracoscopic Versus Conventional Open Repair of Esophageal Atresia: A Systematic
Mustafa Azizoglu1, Sonia Perez Bertolez2, Tahsin Onat Kamci3
1Istanbul Esenyurt Necmi Kadioglu State Hospital, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Istanbul, Turkey; Istinye University, Department of Stem Cell, Tissue Engineering & 3D bioprinting, Istanbul, Turkey.
Insights
Thoracoscopic repair (TR) for esophageal atresia (EA) may lead to fewer long-term musculoskeletal deformities, such as scoliosis and rib anomalies, compared to conventional open repair (COR). Further research is needed to confirm these findings due to limited data.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Thoracic Surgery
- Orthopedic Surgery
Background:
- Esophageal atresia (EA) repair can result in long-term thoracic musculoskeletal deformities.
- Conventional open repair (COR) for EA is associated with potential morbidity.
- Thoracoscopic repair (TR) is hypothesized to offer benefits over COR, including reduced musculoskeletal sequelae.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and compare the incidence of musculoskeletal deformities after EA repair using TR versus COR.
- To emphasize the long-term clinical implications of these deformities.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024576044).
- Comprehensive literature search across multiple databases (Ovid Medline, Cochrane, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Google Scholar) up to January 2025.
- Primary outcomes: scoliosis, rib anomalies, chest wall anomalies, and scapula alata. Statistical analysis using Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4.
Main Results:
- Four retrospective studies with 283 patients (TR: 96; COR: 187) were included.
- TR showed significantly lower rates of scoliosis (3.1% vs. 16%) and rib anomalies (0% vs. 41.5%) compared to COR.
- No significant differences were found for chest wall anomalies or scapula alata. Study limitations include small sample size and methodological variability.
Conclusions:
- Thoracoscopic repair (TR) for EA may reduce long-term musculoskeletal complications, specifically scoliosis and rib anomalies, compared to conventional open repair (COR).
- Findings are promising but require cautious interpretation due to limited sample size and heterogeneity.
- Multicenter studies with standardized outcomes are needed to validate these results and explore muscle-sparing techniques.
Background And Objective:
Thoracic musculoskeletal deformities are a recognized long-term complication after esophageal atresia (EA) repair. Although evidence remains limited, thoracoscopic repair (TR) is thought to reduce morbidity compared to conventional open repair (COR), with potential benefits including earlier recovery, reduced pain, improved cosmesis, and fewer musculoskeletal sequelae. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the incidence of musculoskeletal deformities following EA repair via TR versus COR, emphasizing their long-term clinical implications.
Method:
The protocol for this review was registered in PROSPERO(CRD42024576044). A comprehensive literature search was conducted across Ovid Medline, Cochrane, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Google scholar from inception to January 2025. The primary outcomes assessed were scoliosis, rib anomalies (including deformity, fusion, and adhesions), chest wall anomalies, and scapula alata. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.4.
Results:
Four retrospective studies comprising 283 patients (TR: 96; COR: 187) were included. TR was associated with significantly lower rates of scoliosis (3.1 % vs. 16 %; RR 0.35, 95 % CI 0.14-0.84, p = 0.02) and rib anomalies (0 % vs. 41.5 %; RR 0.05, 95 % CI 0.01-0.25, p = 0.0002). No significant differences were observed for chest wall anomalies (RR 0.65, p = 0.41) or scapula alata (RR 0.37, p = 0.30). However, the small number of studies and variability in diagnostic methods limit the strength and generalizability of these findings.
Conclusion:
TR of EA may reduce long-term musculoskeletal morbidity-particularly scoliosis and rib anomalies-when compared to COR. While promising, these results should be interpreted with caution given the limited sample size and methodological heterogeneity. Further multicenter studies with standardized outcome definitions are warranted to confirm these findings and explore the role of muscle-sparing techniques.
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...

