Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Quantification of Levator Ani Hiatus Enlargement by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Males and Females with Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Published on: April 17, 2019
Is pelvic floor loading in female runners associated with post-run changes in pelvic floor morphometry or function?
Marie-Eve Berube1, Stefan Niederauer2, Ryan Graham3
1School of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Objectives:
To investigate whether, among female runners, transient changes in pelvic floor morphometry, pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function, or pad weight gain observed after a standardised running protocol are associated with the exposure of the pelvic floor to loading during the run.
Methods:
Adult female runners with (n = 19) and without (n = 19) running-induced stress urinary incontinence (RI-SUI) completed a 37-min treadmill-based running protocol with a pressure sensor placed in the posterior fornix of the vagina and a triaxial accelerometer adhered to the pelvis, and an incontinence pad adhered to their undergarment. Pelvic morphometry and PFM function were assessed before and after the run using transperineal ultrasonography and intra-vaginal dynamometry. Urine leakage volume was estimated based on incontinence pad weight gain. Separate linear regression models were used to evaluate the associations between variables representative of pelvic floor load exposure (posterior fornix sensor pressure [PFSP] and pelvic accelerations) and changes in pelvic morphometry, PFM function, and incontinence pad weight observed after the run.
Results:
After the run, the levator hiatus was larger and the bladder neck sat lower in the pelvis, but there were no significant differences in PFM active or passive forces measured using dynamometry. These changes were not different between those with and those without RI-SUI. Higher pelvic accelerations were associated with greater reductions in passive PFM stiffness after the run (R2 = 20%-27%), but not with changes in pelvic morphometry. No associations were found between any measures of pelvic floor load exposure and changes in PFM force-generating capacity. Among runners with RI-SUI, greater pad weight gain occurred among those who ran with slower vector accelerations (R2 = 0.27).
Conclusion:
The magnitude of pelvic floor loading experienced during running does not appear to influence the transient loss in static pelvic organ support observed after running nor urine leakage volume.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Muscles of the Pelvic Floor and Perineum
Perineal Layer
The perineum is a diamond-shaped area below the pelvic diaphragm, divided into an anterior urogenital triangle that contains the external genitals and a posterior anal triangle housing the anus. The urogenital...
Urodynamic Studies: Uroflowmetry
Imaging Studies VI: Voiding Cystourethrography and Cystography
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...

