Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Surgical Techniques for Catheter Placement and 5/6 Nephrectomy in Murine Models of Peritoneal Dialysis
Published on: July 19, 2018
Does suction in Mini PCNL mitigate rise in intrarenal pressure? A prospective randomised study
Madhu Sudan Agrawal1, Naveen Kumar2, Dilip Mishra2
1Institute of Urology and Renal Sciences, Pushpanjali Hospital and Research Centre, Agra, 282002, Uttar Pradesh, India. dr.madhu.agra@gmail.com.
Abstract:
The rise in intra-renal pressure during Mini PCNL (percutaneous nephrolithotripsy) potentially leads to pyelovenous backflow and infectious complications. This prospective randomized study compares intra-renal pressure (IRP) in patients undergoing Mini PCNL (mPCNL) procedure with and without suction for renal stones. Suction mPCNL is expected to lower IRP by continuously aspirating irrigation fluid and stone fragments, thereby enhancing procedural safety. A total of 100 patients with kidney stones measuring 1-4 cm were randomized into two groups: Mini PCNL with suction (n = 50) and Mini PCNL without suction (n = 50). IRP was measured using a pressure transducer connected to a ureteral catheter. Key outcome measures included intra-renal pressure, stone-free rate, operative time, and complication rates. The suction mPCNL group demonstrated a significantly lower IRP (16.92 ± 2.93 mmHg) compared to the non-suction group (19.48 ± 4.77 mmHg, p = 0.002). The suction group also experienced shorter mean operative times (35.98 ± 14.10 min vs. 47.12 ± 15.36 min, p = 0.001) and lithotripsy times (19.50 ± 11.70 min vs. 26.24 ± 10.49 min, p = 0.003). The stone-free rate was higher in the suction group though this difference was not statistically significant. Likewise, the complication rates, including postoperative infection rates (fever and urosepsis) showed a downward trend in the suction group, however the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Suction mPCNL effectively reduces IRP, shortens operative time, maintains a comparable stone-free rate, making it a safer and more efficient alternative to traditional mPCNL. This study highlights the potential advantages of integrating suction mechanisms to control IRP and improve patient outcomes in PCNL procedures.
Insights
Adding suction during Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy (mPCNL) significantly lowers intra-renal pressure (IRP) and operative time. This technique offers a safer, more efficient approach for kidney stone removal compared to traditional mPCNL.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Nephrolithiasis Management
Background:
- Elevated intra-renal pressure during Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy (mPCNL) can lead to pyelovenous backflow and infections.
- Controlling intra-renal pressure (IRP) is crucial for improving safety and outcomes in PCNL procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare intra-renal pressure (IRP) in patients undergoing mPCNL with and without suction.
- To evaluate the impact of suction-assisted mPCNL on operative time, stone-free rates, and complications.
Main Methods:
- A prospective randomized study involving 100 patients with 1-4 cm kidney stones.
- Patients were divided into two groups: mPCNL with suction (n=50) and mPCNL without suction (n=50).
- Intra-renal pressure was measured using a transducer connected to a ureteral catheter.
Main Results:
- The suction mPCNL group showed significantly lower IRP (16.92 ± 2.93 mmHg) versus the non-suction group (19.48 ± 4.77 mmHg, p=0.002).
- Mean operative time (35.98 ± 14.10 min) and lithotripsy time (19.50 ± 11.70 min) were significantly shorter in the suction group.
- While the suction group trended towards higher stone-free rates and lower complication rates, these differences were not statistically significant.
Conclusions:
- Suction-assisted mPCNL effectively reduces intra-renal pressure and operative time.
- This technique presents a safer and more efficient alternative to traditional mPCNL for kidney stone treatment.
- Integrating suction mechanisms holds potential for improved patient outcomes in PCNL procedures.

