Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Integrated Compensatory Responses in a Human Model of Hemorrhage
Published on: November 20, 2016
Military-civilian partnerships on the west coast: Differing models producing combat-ready trauma teams
Reynold Henry1, Demetrios Demetriades, Rachel Hight
1From the Division of Acute Care Surgery (R. Henry), University of Nebraska Medical Center; Department of Surgery (R. Henry, D.L., J.M., B.G., M.S.), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences; Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care (D.D.), Los Angeles General Medical Center-Naval Trauma Training Center; Division of Trauma, Acute Care, and General Surgery (R. Hight), University of California, Davis; Division of Acute Care Surgery (D.L., J.M.C.), University of North Carolina; and Division of Trauma, Critical Care and Acute Care Surgery (J.F.), Oregon Health & Science University.
Abstract:
Military-civilian partnerships have emerged as essential platforms for preparing military trauma surgeons and health care teams for deployment. These programs, many of which were developed following congressional initiatives to enhance military trauma readiness, address the critical issue of sustaining trauma skills during peacetime avoiding a phenomenon known as the "Walker Dip," when skills and proficiency in treating battlefield injuries decline during peacetime after periods of intense conflict. They also provide military surgeons and other providers with training in research methodology and trauma systems management, skills that are difficult to obtain solely within the military structure. This article examines three distinct military-civilian partnership models based on West Coast trauma centers: Oregon Health & Science University (affiliated with the US Army), Los Angeles General Medical Center (affiliated with the US Navy), and UC Davis Medical Center (affiliated with the US Air Force). These programs provide critical trauma exposure while fostering advanced academic and leadership skills. The Joint Trauma System, with its focus on data-driven improvements in trauma care, has further shaped these programs. By comparing these models, we identify their strengths, deficits, and strategies for enhancing training effectiveness. The conclusion highlights the uniqueness of each site and affirms that there are multiple successful approaches to fostering military readiness.
More Related Videos
04:02Author Spotlight: Developing Precise and Clinically Relevant Models for Studying Secondary Degeneration in Traumatic Optic Neuropathy
Published on: November 29, 2024
06:20Author Spotlight: Development of an Automated Camera-Based System for Real-Time Blast Overpressure Monitoring and TBI Risk Assessment in Military Training
Published on: December 6, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
Symptoms and Behavioral Manifestations
A spectrum of distressing symptoms characterizes PTSD. Recurrent flashbacks, where individuals involuntarily relive traumatic events,...
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-II
Physical Therapist
A physical therapist (PT) aims to restore function or prevent additional impairment in a patient following an injury or disease. Massage, heat, cold, water, sonar waves, exercises, and electrical stimulation are some treatments used by PTs to treat...
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-I
Physicians
The physician's primary responsibility is to diagnose illness and direct the medical or surgical treatment of the condition. The authority to admit patients to a healthcare agency or institution and practice care within that setting is granted to physicians by the healthcare agency or institution...
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care