Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors
Published on: February 16, 2024
External multicenter validation of the FAMISH score for predicting metachronous gastric lesions after endoscopic
Mónica Garrido1, Tatiana Cruz Almeida2,3, Ricardo Kuttner-Magalhães3,4
1Department of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.
Background And Objectives:
Surveillance after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is crucial due to the high risk of metachronous gastric lesions (MGL), although this risk may differ between patients. We sought to validate the FAMISH score - a prediction score to estimate MGL risk after gastric ESD - within a multicentric framework.
Materials And Methods:
Performance measures of the FAMISH score were assessed in a retrospective analysis of a multicenter cohort, which included consecutive adult patients undergoing ESD for a primary gastric superficial lesion at 15 international centers, with a minimum endoscopic follow-up of at least 3 years.
Results:
A total of 855 individuals were included, with 20% of them considered low-risk according to the FAMISH score. After a mean follow-up time of 5 years (SD ± 2 years), 168 patients (19.6%) developed MGL. At 3 years of follow-up, the score achieved 90.4% sensitivity and 93.9% NPV. At 5 years follow-up, the score achieved 89.1% sensitivity and 85.3% NPV. The FAMISH risk score achieved a fair diagnostic accuracy with an AUC of 0.618 at 3 years (p < 0.001) and 0.597 (p = 0.006) at 5 years of follow-up. The progression to MGL at 5 years of follow-up was significantly lower for the low-risk group (9.6% vs. 18.2%, p = 0.029).
Conclusions:
The FAMISH score achieved an acceptable diagnostic accuracy in a multicentric validation cohort from Western countries. This score is a useful tool to identify patients with low risk for MGL allowing to safely extend surveillance intervals and reduce the burden of care.
More Related Videos
15:49Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System
Published on: October 16, 2013
05:57ADSC-sheet Transplantation to Prevent Stricture after Extended Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Published on: February 10, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.