Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery
Published on: October 11, 2010
An Integrated Approach to Concurrently Measure Corrective and Adaptive Responses to Auditory Errors
Yaser Merrikhi1, Mohsen Parsa1, Ayoub Daliri1
1College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Tempe.
Purpose:
The brain relies on feedforward and feedback control systems to produce speech movements. Both control systems use auditory errors to generate responses that ensure the accuracy of speech movements. Traditionally, separate auditory perturbation paradigms are used to examine these control systems in isolation; however, this conventional practice is time-consuming and poses practical challenges. This study aimed to develop a new paradigm to examine both control systems concurrently.
Method:
We applied different auditory perturbation magnitudes (0, 125, 250, and 500 Hz) and directions (ε-to-ɪ and ε-to-ӕ) that randomly changed every six trials. We measured formant changes during early (0-100 ms) and late (200-300 ms) time points of production. Early response was used to calculate adaptive responses (a measure of the feedforward control system). The difference between late and early responses was used to calculate corrective responses (a measure of the feedback control system).
Results:
We found that participants produced (a) adaptive and corrective responses in the opposite direction of the perturbation direction and (b) proportionally larger adaptive and corrective responses to the smallest perturbation in the ε-to-ɪ direction. Additionally, participants who responded more to ε-to-ɪ perturbations also responded more to ε-to-ӕ perturbations.
Conclusion:
These findings suggest that (a) the brain may have similar error sensitivity in the ε-to-ɪ and ε-to-ӕ directions and considers error magnitudes in preparing its responses to errors, and (b) our proposed paradigm is a promising approach to efficiently and concurrently measure the contributions of the feedback and feedforward controls systems.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Quality Assurance
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Distance Corrections
Methods of Medium Optimization

