Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Robotic Mirror Therapy System for Functional Recovery of Hemiplegic Arms
Published on: August 15, 2016
Feedback parameters for a closed-loop multiple-input multiple-output model of the upper limb
Ian Syndergaard1, Daniel B Free1, Dario Farina2
1Mechanical Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America.
Abstract:
Both closed-loop models and multi-input multi-output (MIMO) models of the neuromusculoskeletal system of the upper limb are important for simulating and understanding motor control. Yet no large-scale linear neuromusculoskeletal models of the upper limb that are both closed-loop and MIMO have been developed. The primary difficulty in creating such models is choosing appropriate feedback parameters (such as feedback gains and delays), as such a collection of parameters is not available in the literature. The purpose of this work is to 1) present a method for developing MIMO models of short-loop afferent feedback and 2) offer estimates of average feedback parameter values and ranges based on the currently available literature. To this end, we combined measurements of feedback-related parameters available in 26 prior studies with known properties of system stability and behavior. As a result, we present estimated feedback gains and delays for a linear model of the upper limb with inputs into the 13 major superficial muscles and outputs to the 7 main joint degrees of freedom from the shoulder to the wrist. This model includes homonymous feedback mediated by Golgi tendon organs and both homonymous and heteronymous feedback mediated by muscle spindles. As a partial validation of muscle-spindle feedback gains, we compared the sign of the estimated gains to known differences in excess central delay between excitatory and inhibitory connections. The comparison proved correct in all 39 muscle pairs for which we had both estimated a feedback gain and found a measured excess central delay value in the literature. Furthermore, as a partial validation of delay times, we compared estimated delay times to measured innervation lengths. We found a strong fit for efferent delays (R = 0.88) and a moderate fit for afferent delays (R = 0.65). In addition, we demonstrate the effect of feedback on model behavior and present brief comparisons between this behavior and experimentally observed behaviors of the human upper limb with and without feedback.
More Related Videos
06:58A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study
Published on: November 6, 2015
11:06A Human-machine-interface Integrating Low-cost Sensors with a Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation System for Post-stroke Balance Rehabilitation
Published on: April 12, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Open and closed-loop control systems
An open-loop control system operates without feedback from the output. It consists of two primary elements: the controller and the controlled process. The controller receives an input signal...
Multi-input and Multi-variable systems
In the absence...
Parameters Affecting Nonlinear Elimination: Zero-Order Input, First-Order Absorption and Two-Compartment Model
When a drug is administered through a constant intravenous infusion and eliminated via nonlinear pharmacokinetics, it follows zero-order input. For example, oral drugs undergo first-order absorption upon administration and are eliminated through nonlinear pharmacokinetics.
In the case of subcutaneously administered drugs,...
Design Example: Frog Muscle Response
When the switch connecting the RL circuit is closed, a brief muscle contraction is observed. This is because, at a steady state, the inductor acts like a short...
Control System Problem
When forming a closed-loop system, issues can arise if the poles cross into the unstable region, leading to potential...
Second Order systems I
By reinterpreting the system, one can derive the closed-loop transfer function, which...