Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

458
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
458
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine02:50

Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine

5.1K
Combining two or more treatment methods increases the life span of cancer patients while reducing damage to vital organs or tissue from the overuse of a single treatment. Combination therapy also targets different cancer-inducing pathways, thus reducing the chances of developing resistance to treatment.
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
5.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Advance care planning in the last year of life of patients with advanced cancer: patients' perspectives on decision-making and their family and physicians' awareness of future care preferences.

Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice·2026
Same author

Goal disturbance and emotional symptoms in patients with cancer.

Journal of behavioral medicine·2026
Same author

Targeting homologous recombination deficiency with intensified chemotherapy versus standard chemotherapy followed by olaparib in stage III breast cancer (SUBITO): an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.

The Lancet. Oncology·2026
Same author

Timely Integration of specialist palliative care into oncology care for patients receiving radiotherapy for bone metastases: A study procotol for the TIPZO-RT Randomized Controlled Trial.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Challenging the Dynamite Approach of Total Neoadjuvant Treatment for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

JCO oncology practice·2026
Same author

What is the adherence to an exercise intervention during (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy among Swedish patients with breast cancer? Data from the Phys-Can randomised controlled trial.

BMJ open·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.4K

Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Cancer Receiving Systemic Treatment Using

Calvin G Brouwer1, Branca M Bartelet1, Joeri A J Douma2

  • 1Department of Medical BioSciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
|June 30, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Decreased daily step counts from smartphone data can predict upcoming hospitalizations in cancer patients undergoing treatment. This allows for early intervention and proactive management of potential adverse events.

More Related Videos

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

201
Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment
06:49

Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment

Published on: December 11, 2015

9.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.4K
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

201
Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment
06:49

Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment

Published on: December 11, 2015

9.0K

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Digital Health
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Systemic anticancer treatments can lead to clinical adverse events.
  • Monitoring patient physical activity offers a potential avenue for early detection of these events.
  • Smartphone-based activity tracking provides a scalable and accessible method for continuous patient monitoring.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if changes in daily step count, measured via smartphones, can predict clinical adverse events within the following week.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of machine learning models in predicting these events using physical activity data.
  • To assess the potential for proactive toxicity management strategies in cancer care.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective observational cohort study involving cancer patients undergoing systemic treatment.
  • Continuous monitoring of daily step count using participants' own smartphones for 90 days.
  • Development and validation of machine learning models (elastic net, random forest, neural network) using data from the preceding two weeks to predict adverse events in the next seven days.
  • Performance evaluation using Area Under the Curve (AUC).

Main Results:

  • The study analyzed 76 patients; 14% experienced unplanned hospitalizations.
  • Machine learning models accurately predicted unplanned hospitalizations within 7 days (RF AUC=0.88, NN AUC=0.84, EN AUC=0.83).
  • Models demonstrated poor predictive performance for treatment modifications (AUC=0.28-0.51) and overall clinically relevant adverse events (AUC=0.32-0.50).

Conclusions:

  • A decline in daily step count is a significant early predictor of upcoming hospitalizations in cancer patients.
  • Smartphone-based step count monitoring can facilitate proactive and preventive toxicity management.
  • This approach holds promise for improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare utilization during cancer treatment.