Related Experiment Video For HPV genotypes
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
Risk assessment in a Chinese cohort of 96 318 females undergoing opportunistic cervical cancer screening
Jing Zhao1, Wenhan Li1, Zehua Wang1
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Objective:
To assess CIN3+ risk in a Chinese cohort of outpatients undergoing contesting screening and to evaluate the portability of the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP) risk-based management, which was primarily developed using data from the Kaiser Permanente of Northern California (KPNC) cohort.
Methods:
Females aged 25-65 years who were screened with cytology and high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) co-testing between 2011 and 2020 at Wuhan Union Hospital (WHUH) were retrospectively studied. The risks of immediate and 3-year CIN3+ were estimated via prevalence-incidence mixture models. Portability was evaluated via the ratio of the observation risk in the WHUH cohort to the expected risk in the KPNC cohort (O/E) and its 95% CI.
Results:
A total of 96 318 females were included, and 16.83% of the women tested hrHPV-positive at initial screening, who had a CIN3+ immediate risk of 14.14%. The CIN3+ immediate risk varied between subgroups of positive HPV16 (34.09%), HPV18 (13.38%), other HPV types (6.71%), and negative hrHPV (0.12%). Compared to the KPNC cohort, our cohort exhibited a significantly higher CIN3+ immediate risk (1.42% vs 0.46%; O/E, 3.09; 95% CI, 2.92-3.26) and disproportionately increased cancer immediate risks in most subgroups requiring immediate colposcopy or treatment, as well as higher 3-year CIN3+ risks in women with hrHPV-negative ASC-US/NILM. Yet, the action threshold suggested by ASCCP, a CIN3+ immediate risk of 4%, showed good portability to our cohort.
Conclusions:
Despite the higher risks in our cohort, the ASCCP clinical action threshold remains portable. For women with minimal abnormalities or normal results, shortened follow-up intervals should be considered.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Relative Risk
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Disorders of the Female Reproductive System
Bias in Epidemiological Studies

