Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Does Exposure to Certified Stroke Centers Affect All Communities Equitably? Stroke Patient Outcomes by Community
Yu-Chu Shen1, Anthony S Kim2, Renee Y Hsia3
1Department of Defense Management, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA; National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
Study Objective:
To determine how access, treatment, and outcomes change for patients after their community is exposed to a newly certified stroke center based on a community's disadvantage status.
Methods:
In this retrospective observational study, we included Medicare Fee-for-Service patients from a national claims-based database admitted to hospitals between January 2009 and December 2019 whose primary diagnosis was acute ischemic stroke. We implemented linear probability models with community fixed effects to compare changes in outcomes when communities were exposed to newly certified stroke centers nearby relative to similar communities that did not experience stroke center expansion, controlling for patient demographics and comorbid conditions and secular trends. Outcomes included admission to a certified stroke center, receipt of thrombolytic therapy or mechanical thrombectomy, and 1-year mortality.
Results:
We analyzed 2,807,763 patients with acute ischemic stroke. Only 68% of those in disadvantaged communities had exposure to a newly certified stroke center nearby during the study period, whereas 92% of those in advantaged communities had the same exposure. In disadvantaged communities, new stroke centers were associated with a 23.1 percentage point (pp) increase in admission to a stroke center, a 0.3 pp increase in "drip-and-ship" thrombolytic therapy, a 0.2 pp decrease in thrombectomy, and no statistically significant changes in "drip-and-stay" thrombolytic therapy or 1-year mortality. In advantaged communities, new stroke centers were associated with a 4.2 pp increase in admission to a stroke center, a 0.6 pp decrease in "drip-and-ship" thrombolytic therapy, a 0.8 pp increase in "drip-and-stay" thrombolytic therapy, a 0.2 pp increase in thrombectomy, and a small reduction in 1-year mortality of 0.6 pp.
Conclusion:
Stroke center expansion has been uneven, and its effects on patient care differ by a community's socioeconomic status. These findings should guide stroke center initiatives to improve care in disadvantaged communities.
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis IV: Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Cardiac Output II: Effect of Stroke Volume on Cardiac Output
Preload
Preload refers to the initial elongation of the cardiac myocytes before contraction and is related to the volume of blood filling the heart at the end of diastole, or end-diastolic volume. The...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

