Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

04:56
Assessment of Social Transmission of Food Preferences Behaviors
Published on: January 25, 2018
8.1K
Flanders' First Wolf Pack: Publics' Sensemaking and Place-Based Knowledge in Social Media Conversations
Ann Van Herzele1, Liesa Lammens2, Noelle Aarts3
1Institute for Science in Society, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. annvherzele@gmail.com.
Environmental Management
|July 1, 2025
Summary
Publics engage in four sensemaking activities when encountering new ecological changes like gray wolf recolonization in Europe. Place-based knowledge can aid human-wolf coexistence by fostering understanding and experiential perspectives.
Area of Science:
- Human Ecology
- Conservation Social Science
- Science Communication
Background:
- Ecological changes, such as gray wolf recolonization in Europe, present novel challenges for public understanding and acceptance.
- The return of wolves to the Flanders Region (Belgium) after two centuries marks a significant ecological event with profound societal implications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how the public makes sense of unprecedented ecological changes, specifically the recolonization by gray wolves.
- To identify the sensemaking activities and knowledge sources employed by social media users discussing wolf presence.
- To explore the potential of place-based knowledge in navigating human-wolf coexistence.
Main Methods:
- Interpretive qualitative study utilizing ethnographic observation of social media conversations.
- Analysis of public discourse on government social media platforms following wolf-related events.
- Focus on sensemaking activities related to wolf arrival and pack establishment.
Main Results:
- Identified four key sensemaking activities: creating welcoming sentiments, assessing survival chances, anticipating disruptions, and explaining wolves' existence.
- Observed a reliance on abstract knowledge and analogies that did not fully resolve uncertainties.
- Highlighted the dynamic and self-triggering nature of the public sensemaking process.
Conclusions:
- Public sensemaking involves a complex interplay of emotions, assessments, and explanations, often relying on abstract information.
- Despite reliance on abstract knowledge, uncertainties persist in human-wolf coexistence scenarios.
- Place-based knowledge offers a promising avenue for enhancing public understanding and facilitating coexistence by incorporating diverse experiential perspectives.
Related Concept Videos
Group Polarization
35.6K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
35.6K
Social Proof
28.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
28.7K
Social Exchange Theory
35.6K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
35.6K
Social Traps
23.5K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
23.5K
Social Loafing
36.1K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
36.1K
Social Facilitation
33.1K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
33.1K

