Preclinical Modeling of Navtemadlin Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy in IDH-Wild-type Glioblastoma
Rachael A Vaubel1, Wenjuan Zhang2, Ju-Hee Oh2
1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Purpose:
Navtemadlin is a potent small-molecule inhibitor of MDM2, which has completed a phase 0 window-of-opportunity study in glioblastoma (GBM). To optimally interpret the clinical data, a detailed analysis of navtemadlin pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and efficacy was performed in GBM patient-derived xenografts (PDX).
Experimental Design:
Response to navtemadlin was characterized in vitro and in vivo in GBM PDXs with and without MDM2 amplification. Efficacy in vivo was integrated with measured plasma and intra-tumoral drug levels to develop a translational PK/efficacy model comparing exposure effective in PDX to exposure achieved in phase 0 patient samples.
Results:
In vitro, navtemadlin showed robust on-target activity in TP53-wild-type GBM. In vivo efficacy strongly correlated with MDM2 amplification status. In subcutaneous PDXs, navtemadlin significantly extended survival when dosed at 25 mg/kg in an MDM2-amplified PDX compared with 100 mg/kg in a non-amplified PDX. Central nervous system distribution was limited by blood-brain barrier efflux (Kp_brain = 0.009). In an MDM2-amplified orthotopic PDX model, navtemadlin was ineffective at 100 mg/kg; when established in mice with deficient blood-brain barrier efflux (Rag-/-Abcb1a-/-Abcg2-/-), 25 mg/kg doubled survival. A tumor PK/efficacy model was built to define target exposure for efficacy in GBM, using the effective 25 mg/kg dose. Modeled exposures exceeded this threshold in three (of 16) tumor samples from phase 0 study patients at the 240 mg dose level.
Conclusions:
Navtemadlin efficacy was highly dependent on adequate brain penetration. Our translational PK/efficacy model suggests that the minimum effective tumor exposures were achieved only in a minority of patients with GBM.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions


