Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025
05:21
Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
Published on: January 7, 2019
6.0K
A comprehensive framework for evaluating smart cane and developing strategies: integrating IFAHP, SWOT-IFTOPSIS and
1Department of Statistics and Operations Research, College of Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology
|July 1, 2025
Summary
This study introduces a new framework for evaluating smart canes, prioritizing safety and battery life. The WeWALK Smart Cane is identified as the leading model, offering enhanced mobility for visually impaired individuals.
Area of Science:
- Assistive technology research
- Rehabilitation engineering
- Human-computer interaction
Background:
- Visually impaired individuals require advanced mobility aids.
- Existing smart cane technologies need structured evaluation for optimal development and selection.
- A comprehensive framework is essential for improving assistive devices.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose an integrated assessment framework for smart cane technologies.
- To evaluate smart canes using a combination of SWOT analysis, game theory, and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM).
- To guide the selection, development, and continuous improvement of smart cane technologies.
Main Methods:
- Utilized Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (IFAHP) for criteria weighting.
- Employed a customized SWOT matrix and Intuitionistic Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (IFTOPSIS).
- Applied TOWS matrix and fuzzy Shapley value for strategic initiative generation and ranking.
Main Results:
- Safety, battery life, and obstacle detection are paramount user criteria.
- The WeWALK Smart Cane ranked highest among evaluated models.
- Identified key strategic factors and development priorities for smart canes.
Conclusions:
- The proposed framework provides a systematic approach to smart cane evaluation.
- Findings offer insights for enhancing safety features and connectivity in smart canes.
- This research supports professionals in selecting and improving assistive mobility devices for the visually impaired.
Keywords:
MCDMSWOT analysisSmart cane assessmentTOWS matrixfuzzy Shapley valuestrategic prioritisation in smart canesMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:09Decision Making: P-value Method
5.7K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.7K
02:16Stereotype Content Model
14.9K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.9K