Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Validation of a risk-prediction model for pediatric post-discharge mortality after hospital admission for infection
Anneka Hooft1, Christian Umuhoza2,3, Jessica Trawin4
1University of California San Francisco Departments of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Insights
Smart Discharges risk-prediction models effectively identify children at high risk of death after hospital discharge for infection. External validation in Rwanda showed good model performance, supporting their use in resource-limited settings for improved child health outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Epidemiology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Post-discharge mortality poses a significant threat to child health, especially in resource-limited settings.
- Risk-prediction models are crucial for guiding post-discharge care strategies.
- The Smart Discharges models utilize clinical, socio-behavioral, and point-of-care lab data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To externally validate five Smart Discharges risk-prediction models in a Rwandan cohort of children.
- To assess the models' performance in predicting post-discharge mortality in children admitted for suspected sepsis.
- To evaluate model generalizability in a new, resource-limited setting.
Main Methods:
- External validation of five pre-existing risk-prediction models.
- Study cohort: 1218 children (0-60 months) admitted for suspected sepsis in two Rwandan hospitals.
- Performance metrics: Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC), Brier score, sensitivity, specificity, calibration plots.
Main Results:
- All five models demonstrated an AUROC greater than 0.7 (range 0.706-0.738).
- Post-discharge mortality rate was 4.8% (58/1218 children).
- Minimal model degradation observed (1.1%-7.7% AUROC reduction) despite low outcome rates; good calibration below 10% predicted probability.
Conclusions:
- The Smart Discharges risk-prediction models show good discrimination and minimal performance degradation when applied to a Rwandan cohort.
- These models demonstrate potential for effective use in resource-limited settings to identify high-risk children for targeted post-discharge care.
- Further research is needed to assess model calibration in the highest-risk groups for enhanced generalizability.
Abstract:
Mortality following hospital discharge remains a significant threat to child health, particularly in resource-limited settings. The Smart Discharges risk-prediction models use simple clinical, socio-behavioral, and point-of-care lab test variables to successfully predict children at the highest risk of death after hospital admission for infection to guide a risk-based approach to post-discharge care. In Rwanda, we externally validated five models derived from the prior Smart Discharges Uganda studies in a new cohort of children ages 0 days to 60 months admitted for suspected sepsis at two hospitals. We evaluated model performance using metrics including area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), Brier score, and test characteristics (e.g., sensitivity, specificity). Performance was visualized through ROC and gain curves and calibration plots. Of 1218 total children (n = 413, Kigali; n = 805, Ruhengeri), 1161 lived to discharge (95.3%) and 1123 of those completed 6-month follow-up (96.7%). The overall rate of post-discharge mortality was 4.8% (n = 58). All five prediction models tested achieved an area under the receiver-operating curve (AUROC) greater than 0.7 (range 0.706 - 0.738). Low outcome rates resulted in moderately wide confidence intervals. Model degradation ranged from 1.1% to 7.7%, as determined by the percent reduction in AUROC between the internal validation of the original Ugandan cohort and the external Rwandan cohort. Calibration plots showed good calibration for all models at predicted probabilities below 10%. There were too few outcomes to assess calibration among those at the highest predicted risk levels. Discrimination was good with minimal degradation of the model despite low outcome rates. Future work to assess model calibration among the highest risk groups is required to ensure models are broadly generalizable to all children with suspected sepsis in Rwanda and in similar, resource-limited settings.
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention

