Response of social norms to individual differences in error-proneness

  • 0Industry-University Cooperation Foundation, Pukyong National University, Busan, 48513, South Korea.

|

|

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Social norms like L8 (Judging) can maintain cooperation by accounting for individual differences in assessment errors. This approach enhances understanding of social norms in diverse environments.

Area Of Science

  • Evolutionary game theory
  • Social psychology
  • Behavioral economics

Background

  • Indirect reciprocity explains cooperation evolution through observed behavior.
  • Eight evolutionarily stable social norms (leading eight) guide behavior assessment and action.
  • L8 (Judging) norm is often overlooked due to poor cooperation maintenance with diverse opinions.

Purpose Of The Study

  • Re-evaluate the L8 norm's potential in maintaining cooperation.
  • Investigate L8's resilience against assessment errors by considering individual differences.
  • Propose a novel perspective on L8's efficacy in heterogeneous social environments.

Main Methods

  • Theoretical analysis of social norm evolution.
  • Agent-based modeling to simulate interactions under L8.
  • Incorporation of individual heterogeneity in error proneness.

Main Results

  • L8 can be robust against assessment errors when individual differences are considered.
  • Individuals with higher error proneness are disadvantaged under L8.
  • Heterogeneity in error proneness acts as a protective factor for L8.

Conclusions

  • L8 norm's effectiveness is enhanced by acknowledging individual differences in assessment accuracy.
  • Individual differences, modeled as quenched randomness, are crucial for understanding social norms in heterogeneous settings.
  • This research offers a new perspective on the L8 norm and its role in cooperation.

Related Concept Videos

Fundamental Attribution Error 01:14

13.3K

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...

Social Proof 00:52

28.7K

Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.

A good example of social proof is from laugh tracks on television shows. Fullery & Skeffington (1974) found that adding group laughter sounds to material increased how humorous the participants perceived that material, regardless of whether the content itself was funny or not. By adding a laugh...

Conformity 01:20

45.4K

Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.

Asch’s Original Study

Solomon Asch conducted several experiments in the 1950s to determine how people are affected by the thoughts and behaviors of other people. In one study, a group of participants was shown a series of printed line segments of different lengths: a, b, and c. Participants were then shown a fourth line segment: x. They...

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping 02:05

40.5K

People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...

The Stanford Prison Experiment 03:20

23.7K

The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.

Social Roles

One major social determinant of human behavior is our social role—a pattern of behavior that is expected of a person in a given setting or group (Hare, 2003). Each one of us has several social roles. You may be, at the same time, a student, a parent, an aspiring...

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization 01:12

2.6K

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...