Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
Published on: September 10, 2018
Research on the evaluation of canal route schemes based on multiattribute decisionmaking methods
Xinran Fan1, Shiwen Tai2,3, Liang Zhong4
1National Engineering Research Center for Inland Waterway Regulation Chongqing Jiaotong University, 400074, Chongqing, China.
Abstract:
The scientific evaluation of canal route schemes is a crucial aspect of canal engineering design, directly affecting construction costs and overall benefits. Addressing this multi-attribute decision-making problem, this study establishes a comprehensive evaluation system: Initially, a multi-level evaluation system comprising four criteria layers and 20 specific indicators is constructed from the dimensions of technical feasibility, economic benefits, social impact, and environmental protection. In terms of indicator processing, qualitative indicators are quantified using triangular fuzzy numbers combined with the Delphi expert survey method, while quantitative indicators are normalized. For weight determination, an innovative integration of Fuzzy Stochastic Analytic Hierarchy Process (FSAHP) and an improved entropy weight method is employed to achieve complementary advantages of subjective and objective weighting. Subsequently, the strengths of TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) and GRA (Grey Relational Analysis) are combined to construct the TOPSIS-GRA multi-attribute decision-making model. Validation through Monte Carlo simulation indicates that the model maintains stable evaluation results under fluctuations in criteria layer weights and changes in subjective weight sensitivity, demonstrating excellent interference resistance and robustness. This research outcome provides a scientific and reliable technical support for decision-making on canal route schemes, significantly enhancing the accuracy and objectivity of scheme selection.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Design Example: Alignment of a Road Line Using GIS
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Routes of Persuasion
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance

