Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...

Nonconscious Mimicry

Nonconscious Mimicry

Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.

Altruism

Altruism

Altruistic behaviors are “unselfish” behaviors—those that help another individual at the expense of the individual carrying out the behavior. Despite the negative consequences for the altruistic animal, these behaviors are thought to have evolved for several reasons.

Instinctive Drift

Instinctive Drift

Instinctive drift refers to the tendency of animals to revert to their innate behaviors despite repeated reinforcement. Breland and Breland demonstrated this concept in an experiment with a raccoon. The raccoon was trained to pick up two coins and place them in a container in exchange for food. Initially, the raccoon learned to associate the coins with food, making them a conditioned stimulus or a substitute for food. However, over time, the raccoon became less willing to put the coins into the...

Social Proof

Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.

Robbers Cave

Robbers Cave

During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

More connections, higher polarization: The role of weak ties and status-driven dynamics.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

Same author

The impact of interventions against science disinformation in high school students.

Scientific reports·2025

Same author

Supply-chain vulnerabilities in critical medicines: A persistent risk to pharmaceutical security.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025

Same author

US tariffs jeopardize medicine supply chains.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025

Same author

Coexistence of balance and hierarchies: An ego perspective to explain empirical networks.

PNAS nexus·2025

Same author

The quest for an unbiased scientific impact indicator remains open.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024

Same journal

Turbulent flow in a vortex separator with a directed pipe inlet.

Scientific reports·2026

Same journal

Systematic characteristic evaluation of clay-based cementitious material derived from calcium carbide residue and waste tile powder.

Scientific reports·2026

Same journal

Retraction Note: Improvement of a rapid diagnostic application of monoclonal antibodies against avian influenza H7 subtype virus using Europium nanoparticles.

Scientific reports·2026

Same journal

Applying large language models to spam detection in the Kazakh low-resource language setting.

Scientific reports·2026

Same journal

An open-source 3D printing system enabling in-situ freeze-thaw processing of hydrogels.

Scientific reports·2026

Same journal

An enhanced EfficientNet framework for automated waste classification using cosine annealing and label smoothing.

Scientific reports·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 17, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Irrational herding persists in human-bot interactions.

Luca Verginer¹, Giacomo Vaccario^2,3, Piero Ronzani⁴

¹Chair of Systems Design, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. lverginer@ethz.ch.

Scientific Reports

|July 2, 2025

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Humans often exhibit herding behavior, even when aware of interacting with automated entities (bots). This study found that awareness of bots did not significantly alter human decision-making in a strategic game.

More Related Videos

Automated Interactive Video Playback for Studies of Animal Communication

Automated Interactive Video Playback for Studies of Animal Communication

Published on: February 9, 2011

A Real-Time Interactive System for Studying Confrontational Pursuit Behavior in Rodents

A Real-Time Interactive System for Studying Confrontational Pursuit Behavior in Rodents

Published on: May 16, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 17, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Automated Interactive Video Playback for Studies of Animal Communication

Automated Interactive Video Playback for Studies of Animal Communication

Published on: February 9, 2011

A Real-Time Interactive System for Studying Confrontational Pursuit Behavior in Rodents

A Real-Time Interactive System for Studying Confrontational Pursuit Behavior in Rodents

Published on: May 16, 2025

Area of Science:

Behavioral Economics
Human-Computer Interaction
Social Psychology

Background:

Understanding human herding behavior is crucial in strategic interactions.
Distinguishing between irrational herding and rational self-interest remains a challenge.
The increasing prevalence of automated entities (bots) in human interactions necessitates studying their influence on decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate human herding behavior in a strategic setting involving interactions with bots.
To examine how awareness of interacting with bots affects human behavior and beliefs.
To differentiate between irrational herding and rational self-interest in a controlled environment.

Main Methods:

Conducted an online minority game with 1997 participants.
Divided participants into two groups: informed and unaware of playing against bots.
Rewarded participants for adopting the minority strategy.

Main Results:

Informed participants adjusted their beliefs about bot behavior but not their decisions.
A significant portion (30%) of participants exhibited herding behavior (following the majority) in both conditions.
Herding behavior persisted despite awareness of interacting with automated entities.

Conclusions:

Human herding behavior is robust and persists even when individuals are aware of bots.
Awareness of automated entities does not eliminate irrational herding in strategic decision-making.
Findings have implications for understanding human behavior on digital platforms with bot interactions.