Comparison of real-time PCR and nCounter NanoString techniques to validate copy number alterations in oral cancer
- Rinal Chavda 1,2, Mayuri Inchanalkar 1,2, Jitendra Gawde 3, Manoj B Mahimkar 4,5
- Rinal Chavda 1,2, Mayuri Inchanalkar 1,2, Jitendra Gawde 3
- 1Mahimkar Lab, Cancer Research Institute Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, , Maharashtra, 410210, India.
- 2Homi Bhabha National Institute, Training School Complex, Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400094, India.
- 3Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Biostatistician, Cancer Research Institute, Tata Memorial Centre (TMC), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India.
- 4Mahimkar Lab, Cancer Research Institute Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, , Maharashtra, 410210, India. mmahimkar@actrec.gov.in.
- 5Homi Bhabha National Institute, Training School Complex, Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400094, India. mmahimkar@actrec.gov.in.
- 0Mahimkar Lab, Cancer Research Institute Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, , Maharashtra, 410210, India.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Real-time PCR is a robust method for validating genomic biomarkers in oral cancer. nCounter NanoString showed moderate agreement but identified different prognostic gene associations compared to PCR.
Area Of Science
- Genomics
- Cancer Research
- Molecular Biology
Background
- Copy number alterations (CNAs) are crucial for cancer prognosis and treatment prediction.
- Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a standard for validating genomic profiling results.
- The nCounter NanoString platform's utility for CNA analysis requires further evaluation.
Purpose Of The Study
- To comprehensively compare real-time PCR and nCounter NanoString for copy number analysis in oral cancer.
- To assess the prognostic implications of specific gene CNAs identified by both methods.
- To evaluate the concordance between the two techniques.
Main Methods
- Analysis of 24 genes across 119 oral cancer samples.
- Comparison of real-time PCR and nCounter NanoString techniques.
- Statistical analysis using Spearman's rank correlation and Cohen's Kappa.
- Prognostic evaluation using Kaplan-Meier curves and Log-rank tests for RFS, DSS, and OS.
Main Results
- Spearman's rank correlation (r=0.188 to 0.517) and moderate to substantial agreement (Cohen's Kappa) were observed between the methods.
- Real-time PCR identified ISG15 as a favorable prognostic marker for RFS, DSS, and OS, and ATM, CASP4, CYB5A for poor RFS.
- nCounter NanoString indicated ISG15 as a poor prognostic marker for RFS, DSS, and OS, and CDK11A for poor RFS.
Conclusions
- Real-time PCR is a reliable method for validating genomic biomarkers in oral cancer.
- Discrepancies in prognostic gene associations between real-time PCR and nCounter NanoString warrant further investigation.
- Independent studies are needed to validate these findings.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Related Concept Videos
02:26
Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
02:57
Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, or Real-time RT-PCR, is an analytical tool used to determine the expression level of target genes. The method involves converting mRNA to complementary DNA with the help of an enzyme known as reverse transcriptase, followed by the PCR amplification of the cDNA. These two processes can be performed simultaneously in a single tube or separately as a two-step reaction.
The real-time quantification of the number of amplified products is...

