Evaluating cluster counting of Cs complexes through the study of nitrogen implanted zirconium
A K Balamurugan1, P A Manojkumar2, E Senthil Kumar3
1Surface and Thin Films Studies Section, Surface and Sensors Studies Division, Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research, Kalpakkam, 603102, India. akb@igcar.gov.in.
Scientific Reports
|July 2, 2025
Summary
The cluster counting method significantly improves elemental composition estimates in secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) depth profiling, especially for complex samples. This advanced technique offers more accurate results compared to the single Cs complex approach.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Surface Analysis
- Analytical Chemistry
Background:
- Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS) is crucial for elemental depth profiling.
- Accurate quantification in SIMS can be challenging due to matrix effects and varying secondary ion complex formation.
- Previous studies indicated cluster counting improves composition estimates over single complex analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the cluster counting method for SIMS depth profiling on a nitrogen-implanted zirconium specimen with high oxygen impurities.
- To compare the accuracy of cluster counting versus single Cs complex analysis against X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) data.
- To investigate the impact of trace impurities like fluorine and chlorine on composition estimates.
Main Methods:
- SIMS depth profiling was performed on a nitrogen-implanted zirconium specimen.
- Elemental composition was quantified using both cluster counting and single Cs complex methods.
- Results were cross-validated with XPS depth profiling data.
Main Results:
- The cluster counting method provided significantly more accurate elemental composition estimates than the single Cs complex approach.
- Trace impurities (fluorine, chlorine) initially dominated estimates due to high sensitivity, but relative sensitivity factors corrected this.
- Adjusted relative sensitivity factors for cluster-counted Cs complexes enabled exact matching of SIMS and XPS elemental compositions.
Conclusions:
- Cluster counting is a superior method for SIMS depth profiling, yielding more accurate elemental composition estimates, particularly in challenging matrices.
- The method offers improved quantification, even with significant matrix effects and trace impurities.
- The study provides valuable relative sensitivity factors for Cs complexes, aiding future SIMS research and sputter rate estimation.
Related Concept Videos
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
44.8K
Tetrahedral Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
44.8K
Valence Bond Theory
9.7K
Coordination compounds and complexes exhibit different colors, geometries, and magnetic behavior, depending on the metal atom/ion and ligands from which they are composed. In an attempt to explain the bonding and structure of coordination complexes, Linus Pauling proposed the valence bond theory, or VBT, using the concepts of hybridization and the overlapping of the atomic orbitals. According to VBT, the central metal atom or ion (Lewis acid) hybridizes to provide empty orbitals of suitable...
9.7K
Lattice Centering and Coordination Number
10.0K
The structure of a crystalline solid, whether a metal or not, is best described by considering its simplest repeating unit, which is referred to as its unit cell. The unit cell consists of lattice points that represent the locations of atoms or ions. The entire structure then consists of this unit cell repeating in three dimensions. The three different types of unit cells present in the cubic lattice are illustrated in Figure 1.
Types of Unit Cells
Imagine taking a large number of identical...
Types of Unit Cells
Imagine taking a large number of identical...
10.0K


