Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment
Published on: March 13, 2021
Enhancing agricultural commodity price forecasting with deep learning.
R L Manogna1, Vijay Dharmaji2, S Sarang2
1Department of Economics and Finance, Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus, Zuari nagar, Sancoale, 403726, Goa, India. manognar@goa.bits-pilani.ac.in.
Deep learning models, like Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Units (GRU), significantly improve agricultural commodity price forecasting accuracy. These advanced methods outperform traditional models in predicting volatile prices, aiding market planning.
Area of Science:
- Agricultural Economics
- Data Science
- Time Series Forecasting
Background:
- Accurate agricultural commodity price forecasting is crucial for market planning and policy in agriculture-dependent economies.
- Price volatility, influenced by weather and market demand, presents significant challenges for traditional forecasting methods.
- A comprehensive evaluation of various forecasting models is needed to address these challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the performance of traditional stochastic, machine learning, and deep learning models for agricultural commodity price forecasting.
- To identify the most effective models for capturing complex temporal patterns and volatility in commodity prices.
- To provide insights for improving market interventions, crop planning, and risk management strategies.
Main Methods:
- Utilized daily wholesale price data for 23 commodities from January 2010 to June 2024.
- Assessed traditional models (ARIMA), machine learning (SVR, XGBoost), and deep learning approaches (MLP, RNN, LSTM, GRU, ESN).
- Compared model performance using error metrics such as Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE).
Main Results:
- Deep learning models, specifically Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Units (GRU), demonstrated superior forecasting accuracy.
- GRU achieved significantly lower RMSE and MAPE for commodities like onions and tomatoes compared to the ARIMA model.
- Deep learning models effectively captured complex temporal patterns and nonlinear dynamics inherent in agricultural commodity prices.
Conclusions:
- Deep learning techniques, particularly LSTM and GRU, offer a more reliable approach to forecasting volatile agricultural commodity prices.
- These findings support enhanced market interventions, better crop planning, and more effective risk management for stakeholders.
- Future research should explore hybrid models and incorporate external data, such as weather information, to further boost forecasting accuracy.
Related Concept Videos
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Light Acquisition
Predicting Products: Substitution vs. Elimination
The following factors can influence the mechanisms competing against each other:
Multiple Regression
Farmers can use multiple regression to determine the crop yield based on more than one factor, such as water availability, fertilizer, soil properties, etc. Here, the crop yield is the response or dependent variable as it depends on the other independent variables. The analysis requires the construction of a scatter plot...
Upsampling
Aggregates Classification
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...

