Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...

Surveys

Surveys

Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Curcumin-based nanomaterials for dual-target inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 omicron main protease and HMPV RNA polymerase: A computational study.

International journal of biological macromolecules·2026

Same author

The correlation between workplace ergonomics and musculoskeletal complains in Iranian technical and vocational training organization; a semi-quantitative study to provide preventive educational strategies.

Journal of education and health promotion·2026

Same author

Federated foundation models for psychiatry: a new paradigm for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of mood disorders.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2026

Same author

Intermittent Fasting May Enhance Resistance Training Effects on the Body Composition of Obese Males, Without Affecting Muscular Strength and Anabolic Index.

Journal of obesity·2026

Same author

The Mobile Applications for Low Back and Neck Pain Therapy: App Review.

The archives of bone and joint surgery·2026

Same author

Global seroprevalence of Toxocara infection in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of a neglected parasitic threat.

BMC infectious diseases·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 17, 2025

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

Design, implementation, and evaluation of faculty member evaluation process using electronic 360-degree method.

Farin Tatari^1,2, Maryam Ebrahimi^3,4,5, Hamidreza Tadayon⁶

¹Department of Midwifery, Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur, Iran.

BMC Medical Education

|July 2, 2025

Summary

Implementing an electronic 360-degree faculty evaluation system, incorporating students, peers, and administrators, led to high satisfaction among faculty and students. This comprehensive method offers a better understanding of faculty performance.

Keywords:

360-degree method Academic institutions Educational evaluation process Electronic system Evaluation process

More Related Videos

Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective

Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective

Published on: July 1, 2015

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 17, 2025

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective

Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective

Published on: July 1, 2015

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

Area of Science:

Medical Education
Educational Technology
Performance Evaluation

Background:

Faculty evaluation is crucial for educational quality and university performance.
Student-based evaluations are common but insufficient for comprehensive faculty assessment.
Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences sought to improve its faculty evaluation system.

Purpose of the Study:

To design, implement, and evaluate a faculty member evaluation process.
To utilize an electronic 360-degree feedback method for comprehensive faculty assessment.

Main Methods:

A developmental research project in three stages: design, implementation, and evaluation.
Expert panel methods were used to develop evaluation checklists.
A cross-sectional study with researcher-made questionnaires assessed satisfaction with the electronic 360-degree evaluation method, with data from 373 students and 48 faculty members analyzed.

Main Results:

The electronic 360-degree evaluation system weighted sources as: students (40%), head of department (30%), vice-chancellor (20%), and peers (10%).
Both faculty members and students reported high satisfaction with the electronic 360-degree evaluation system.
Faculty satisfaction varied significantly based on gender and age.

Conclusions:

The electronic 360-degree evaluation method provides a comprehensive understanding of faculty performance.
University administrators are encouraged to adopt this method due to high satisfaction levels.
This system enhances the evaluation of faculty roles beyond traditional student-only assessments.